Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rabin

Now Hastert deserves any conviction he might get for his sexual perversion but I separately wonder if this law is really necessary, meaningful, or right. The amounts of money we move or carry is not the government’s business so long as we are not doing something illegal. Am I wrong?


29 posted on 08/19/2015 1:14:39 AM PDT by Reno89519 (American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reno89519

No you’re not wrong. The law was intended original to track illegal activity for drugs, etc. However, government never can “eat just one”. The IRS got in the act and all the others, too hoping to get some of that seizure money I guess.

Hastert screwed up when he lied to Federal investigators’ questions which is illegal. Had he spoke the truth, he’d probably not have been indicted.


31 posted on 08/19/2015 2:08:47 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson