Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heading Toward An EMP Catastrophe
Family Security Matters ^ | July 23, 2015 | AMBASSADOR R. JAMES WOOLSEY, DR. PETER VINCENT PRY

Posted on 08/01/2015 11:09:02 AM PDT by TXnMA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: discostu

>> just isn’t going to happen <<

A Carrington Event WILL happen sooner or later. It’s inevitable.


61 posted on 08/01/2015 2:10:31 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

“Which is still a trivial amount. Lightening bolts generate more than that. We don’t have panic and chaos concerning lightening bolts”

There is a big difference between lightning and EMP. Lightning is spectral low frequency. It’s also a point source and decays with the square of distance. An emp is not like that (I’ll tell you why if you want to know)

Lightning strikes do lots of damage but can also be protected against effectively. It’s the same with an emp. It’s just a much bigger problem in scope and size.

Lightning protection does very little to limit emp energy for the most part.


62 posted on 08/01/2015 2:11:26 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nomad

>> Why not simply duplicate all the big transformers and station the across the nation in secured underground metal lined ‘Faraday’ vaults for future use. <<

I think that’s one of the important steps Jim Woolsey and others advocate. But so far, Congress has totally failed its responsibility to act.


63 posted on 08/01/2015 2:14:33 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

It’s about power range. Yes a kiloton bomb can make an EMP wave, but it’s weak in close and basically non-existent very quickly. To actually take out electronics, at 619KM from the blast (horizon from 30KM up) takes a high end nuclear device. Even most of the countries that have nukes don’t have nukes that big, and even most of the nukes they have that big can’t be operated that high up.

I AM using easily obtained facts to argue. The facts say all the people worried about EMPs from 3rd world holes like Iran are quite simply being silly.


64 posted on 08/01/2015 2:16:45 PM PDT by discostu (It always comes down to cortexiphan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

>> This is not new news; how long ago was it that we tested nukes over the Pacific? <<

Good point. I was working on nuke-related matters back in 1966-67, and the disastrous effects of EMP were very much under discussion at the time.


65 posted on 08/01/2015 2:17:52 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Yes WBEN.com there is a listen live link.
Show is on 1 to 3 every Saturday, I fill in every few weeks and really shake things up here in Erie county


66 posted on 08/01/2015 2:18:21 PM PDT by The Mayor (Honesty means never having to look over your shoulder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: fifedom

Pakistan and NK can’t get items that far up.

“Only 3 times higher than airliners” is actually pretty extremely high. You’re deep in the area where you need to provide oxygen to the propellant.

Iran has had plenty of money for a long time. If Russia and China were going to sell them nukes and missiles they already would have. The Iraqi food for oil program already showed us which countries give a damn about sanctions, and they were on the list.

Given that in the end there’s nothing you can do about it and all paranoia on this is pointless it’s not about betting your life, it’s about not raising your blood pressure for no good reason. Worry about things that A - might actually happen, and B - you can actually fix. Life’s too short to fret about things that won’t happen.


67 posted on 08/01/2015 2:20:38 PM PDT by discostu (It always comes down to cortexiphan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

We had one 3 years ago. But it missed. Space is big. Earth is actually pretty small.


68 posted on 08/01/2015 2:21:53 PM PDT by discostu (It always comes down to cortexiphan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: discostu

“Yes a kiloton bomb can make an EMP wave, but it’s weak in close and basically non-existent very quickly.”

Not true.

Did you know that a 10kt nuke device generates 80% or more of the emp field strength as a 100kt device?

A 1kt device is around 60%-70%.

Device gamma yield is what matters, and the emp effect is remarkably non-linear.

It’s a fact. You can check it.


69 posted on 08/01/2015 2:22:45 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Actually the fact is that the EMP yield is more EFFICIENT at smaller bombs but a bigger bomb:
The EMP at a fixed distance from an explosion increases at most as the square root of the yield (see the illustration to the right). This means that although a 10 kiloton weapon has only 0.7% of the energy release of the 1.44-megaton Starfish Prime test, the EMP will be at least 8% as powerful. Since the E1 component of nuclear EMP depends on the prompt gamma ray output, which was only 0.1% of yield in Starfish Prime but can be 0.5% of yield in low yield pure nuclear fission weapons, a 10 kiloton bomb can easily be 5 x 8% = 40% as powerful as the 1.44 megaton Starfish Prime at producing EMP.

But you’re still going to get more EMP from a bigger bomb. You’re just fighting diminishing returns. Which is yet another reason why it’s just not going to happen.


70 posted on 08/01/2015 2:27:27 PM PDT by discostu (It always comes down to cortexiphan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: discostu

“But you’re still going to get more EMP from a bigger bomb. You’re just fighting diminishing returns. “

You are spouting details you look up on Wikipedia. You have no grasp of the physics involved. You are actually arguing settled science- the e1 energy generated from a certain gamma yield weapon. You also do not understand the underlying physics of how gamma yield creates an RF pulse.

You’re at the point where you should stop posting nonsense and listen to the folks on the thread who know something and/or as intelligent questions.

You are so ill informed that you confuse well-meaning folks who want to learn.


71 posted on 08/01/2015 2:34:38 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Notice all you’re doing anymore is attacking the person. Not the facts. So since we both know you’re wrong, have a nice day.


72 posted on 08/01/2015 2:38:11 PM PDT by discostu (It always comes down to cortexiphan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

I thought blocking capacitors only worked on DC circuits.


73 posted on 08/01/2015 2:42:39 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: discostu

“Notice all you’re doing anymore is attacking the person. Not the facts. So since we both know you’re wrong, have a nice day.”

The APA published a study. In it they found that some people are too far down on the cognitive capability scale that they truly cannot know what they do not know, so they conclude that they must be right, even though the tools and resources are available to educate them.

Don’t be that guy.


74 posted on 08/01/2015 2:44:03 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Look you told me it was a fact and I could check. I did check. And found you were wrong. And now you’re attacking me. If you’re going to encourage people to check your work you should do so yourself. And if there’s somebody in this thread that too far down on the cognitive capability scale it would be the one that now is going exclusively for personal attacks.


75 posted on 08/01/2015 2:46:25 PM PDT by discostu (It always comes down to cortexiphan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

A capacitor will block dc current on a power transmission line caused by a solar storm GIC. They are commonly used at high latitudes. Quebec hydro uses them, for instance. They are BIG capacitors, but they do the job


76 posted on 08/01/2015 2:46:44 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: discostu

“Look you told me it was a fact and I could check. I did check. And found you were wrong.”

You checked the wrong thing.


77 posted on 08/01/2015 2:48:17 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

I checked the right thing. I can tell by how you react. You’re wrong. You actually proved it. Congrats. Now be a man about it.


78 posted on 08/01/2015 2:49:33 PM PDT by discostu (It always comes down to cortexiphan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

So if these capacitors were at the intersection of power lines and state boarders, they would do a good job of mitigating the long haul transmission of the EMP pulse?

I understand that BIG capacitors are not cheap. Would you be willing to venture a guess as to how much they cost?


79 posted on 08/01/2015 2:51:02 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: discostu

>> We had one 3 years ago. But it missed <<

No, we didn’t have a Carrington Event then. What you’re referring to was a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) that missed the Earth. It would have qualified as a Carrington Event only if it had actually hit us head-on.

But another Carrington Event is bound to happen SOME day, maybe in the next 10 years, maybe in the next 100 years or longer. And if we don’t take adequate steps before then to mitigate its effects, it well might bring our entire electricity-dependent civilization to an end.


80 posted on 08/01/2015 3:01:13 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson