Skip to comments.
Flouting The Law, Some New Yorkers Won't Register Guns (NPR)
NPR ^
| July 24th '15
| Joel Rose
Posted on 07/24/2015 5:21:22 PM PDT by Drango
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: QT3.14
21
posted on
07/24/2015 6:05:58 PM PDT
by
4Runner
To: Drango
I just can’t imagine people ignoring the law like that....
22
posted on
07/24/2015 6:07:59 PM PDT
by
Psalm 73
("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
To: Psalm 73
my beeber was stuned too.
23
posted on
07/24/2015 6:10:21 PM PDT
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: Drango
14th Amendment—equal protection of the laws.
Use the least restrictive State’s laws and bring it to the Supreme Court.
If the logic works for gay marriage, why not for guns?
24
posted on
07/24/2015 6:11:44 PM PDT
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: Cboldt
Mr. Fuller will be arrested, admitted lawbreaker, and to a reporter. Dumbass. Yep
25
posted on
07/24/2015 6:16:59 PM PDT
by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: Drango
26
posted on
07/24/2015 6:20:47 PM PDT
by
null and void
(If the government can't protect the Marines, how can we expect it to protect us?)
To: onona
Gun Sanctuary.
Take in an orphan TODAY!
27
posted on
07/24/2015 6:22:20 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Steely Tom
They’re just pro-choice. On guns
28
posted on
07/24/2015 6:28:19 PM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
To: Drango
In CT non-compliance to a similar law was estimated at 85%.
Which was something like 300,000 guns in the hands of 100,000 gunowners engaged in a massive act of civil disobedience
To: Drango
Same thing happened in California around 1999 I think. "Assault Weapon" ownership was conservatively estimated at about 8 million in private hands. Less than 300,000 were registered.
30
posted on
07/24/2015 6:33:18 PM PDT
by
semaj
(Audentes fortuna juvat: Fortune favors the bold. Be Bold FRiends.)
To: mrsmel
“we are no longer a nation of laws”
Yup. It’s every man for himself.
Tone is set at the top. Laws are for the powerful to attempt to control the powerless.
31
posted on
07/24/2015 6:41:14 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(WSJs approval of law-breaking and disdain for the Bill of Rights reveals anti-American principles)
To: Drango
Have heard from some folk who live in that general area that many people are registering junk, spare parts, worn out magazines, etc, just so they can surrender something if it comes to that. The good stuff is safely stored away.
32
posted on
07/24/2015 6:43:12 PM PDT
by
jstaff
To: semaj
As much as the liberals bleated about the registration not being used, BS!
Someyears after the registration, I got into radio scanning and heard a call to a domestic disturbance and the dispatcher told the cops that the record showed assault weapons being registered to that address.
The cops most certainly have that info at their fingertips, at least the ones where I lived in Ventura county did at the time. Cannot be better now a decade later.
To: Drango
How about a ‘Sanctuary City’ for people who don't believe in following gun laws?
Surely NPR would back that... they have ZERO respect for our immigration laws... Why would they object to us having zero respet for the laws they favor?
Hypocrites. Liberal elite jerks.Yes, National Public Radio - we're talking about YOU.
34
posted on
07/24/2015 7:02:58 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(They are not undocumented and they are not immigrants. They are illegal aliens. Lurkinnamloomin)
To: Drango
Remember when CT passed their draconian gun laws and all the political talking heads were threatening gun owners that they'd better register or else? Some of the local police actually went on record as salivating over raiding gun owner's homes and killing them to get their guns. That was before the implementation date. Gun owners stood firm and said: “Come and take them.”
Now faced with the prospect of deadly force shootouts and the fascist oppressors going room temperature in the process, plus the fact these very same people have painted themselves into a bulls eye, the rhetoric and hype stopped. It didn't help that other chief law enforcement officers said they would not enforce this unconstitutional law. So far the politicians are hesitating at the possibility of armed resistance to their “law” if they implement it.
“Do not fire unless fired upon. If they mean to have a war, let it begin here.” — Captain John Parker, Lexington Green, Massachusetts, 19 April 1775.
To: Cboldt
The 2nd amendment says he does not have to register,dumbass
36
posted on
07/24/2015 8:26:26 PM PDT
by
advertising guy
(it is now time to be counted)
To: advertising guy
--
The 2nd amendment says he does not have to register,dumbass --
I know that, and you know that, but the state of NY doesn't, and the courts don't either.
37
posted on
07/25/2015 12:50:21 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Drango
The SAFE act is a living and breathing law; citizens should be entitled to interpret it as they see fit.
38
posted on
07/28/2015 3:48:56 PM PDT
by
grumpygresh
(My real thoughts have been self censored.)
To: Drango
...60 percent of New Yorkers support the SAFE ActThey likely took this poll down in the Liberal hive of New York City, which voted 80+ percent for Obama. They already gave up their 2nd Amendment freedoms years ago in the interest of "safety". Now they have neither.
39
posted on
07/28/2015 5:24:43 PM PDT
by
Gritty
(A citizenry that votes for an asshole is less deluded than one that votes for a messiah-Mark Steyn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson