Posted on 07/21/2015 5:57:05 AM PDT by C19fan
Of what it is constituted and how it is "proffered and prospered" within the current (political) culture and how it is being supported through ^political correctness^ (AKA: Tolerance/Diversity/Multi-Culturalism).
I've copied JimRob to see if such a discussion can take place within the conservative environment. We, on FR, of a specific mind. Can the current conservative campaigners join?
I don't know...I suspect that every candidate will avoid such a discussion. I would think that, maybe, Trump would not shy-away since he OBVIOUSLY prefers women and monogamous relationships. Oh, and he is paying his own way in the process (just like Geo. Washington).
I don`t think it is any big thing to worry about for various reasons.
As TangledUpInBlue said criminalizing Christian beliefs is the object, I would go farther and say criminalize the Bible.
Secondly men and women can have all of the sex partners they want with out the responsibility of marriage so if sex was the object why would a bunch of irresponsible people want that.
Thirdly the people who would seriously consider plural marriage would be those who would have a wish to bring back the days of the patriots of the Bible.
We have nuts in the supreme court so I have no doubt any idiot could make it happen.
But in short people who would seriously consider polygamy would be the more reasonable and responsible people and they would have no reason for it.
I really could not care less if polygamy is legalized at this point. Once we got "gay marriage" it was "game over" for our civilization. I guess my outrage meter is busted now.
Don’t stop at humans. All species matter. I demand to marry a tiger, an elephant, 3 ants and a squirrel.
Compared to Gay marriage and Tranny’s and transgendering 5 year olds, and saluting a man dressed as a female officer in the army, Polygamy isn’t even offensive.
Future Shock by Toffler talked about this in the 70s. Plural marriages are just one small part of the overall tectonic cultural shift.
And polyandry.
Once we got “gay marriage” it was “game over” for our civilization. I guess my outrage meter is busted now.
I’m looking forward to marrying my poodle for the tax benefits. I don’t think the marriage will be consummated.
Why not go straight to bestiality?
Yes its time to stop fighting all these things and embrace our white privilege. Why can't I have two or three, at least one will be ready when I am and the other can make me a sandwich for later.
The reality is that when they were not fighting with each other they would gang up on you and nag you to death.
Once you legalize one perversion, the others will rapidly follow. They will rule that you can’t discriminate for one and not the others.
Absolutely.
People have been bamboozled by the TV shows, and the ridiculous "we're just two people who love each other" horsepuckey.
That appalling scotus decision conflates playing in sewage with marital relations. Are you acquainted with their practice of "rimming" ? Or why they classify themselves as "tops", "bottoms" or "vers" ?
Their practices are grossly disgusting, extremely unhealthy and utterly unsanitary.
THAT should be widely known instead of the pretty picture of "two lovers" in the throes of romantic rapture.
Oh, brother.
haha. Well, it’s true. Even perfectly fit personal trainers cannot keep up. And I can still get faster...
99.999% of AIDS is transmitted through homosexual sodomy.
Thats the Official Position of the North American Man Dog Love Association..or NAMDLA
#Civilizationloses
Good advice and I will try to take it to heart and remember it and act on it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.