Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Okinotorishima-ization: South China Sea arbitration case enters middle game
Asia Times ^ | Peter Lee

Posted on 07/19/2015 12:07:59 PM PDT by Lorianne

Two disputed geographic features in the South China Sea that are the focus of island-building by the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Fiery Cross and South Johnson Reef, were both originally endowed with natural pre-existing rocks protruding above the waterline at high tide. That’s big news.

This state of affairs was pointed out by Bill Hayton, author of the highly-regarded The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia on his Twitter feed.

What’s even bigger news is that the Philippines has already admitted the fact, in its “Notification and Statement of Claim in the West Philippine Sea” delivered to the Chinese embassy in January 2013.

And the Philippine government might be kicking itself for making so generous an admission in its filing with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) Arbitration Commission seeking a ruling to invalidate the PRC’s notorious Nine-Dash-Line.

By conventional UNCLOS interpretation, an uninhabitable rock only gets a 12 mile territorial limit, not a 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone.

(Excerpt) Read more at atimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china

1 posted on 07/19/2015 12:07:59 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

The Butchers of Beijing have clearly been promised “flexibility” by Obola.Translation...the Philippines,Vietnam and Thailand are fresh out of luck if they had fantasies of controlling any of the billions of barrels of oil in the South China Sea.


2 posted on 07/19/2015 12:15:53 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

People don’t understand something:

If China takes one of all of the Senkaku Islands, that means there would still be totally uncontested Japanese islands nearby with long airfields —something militarily bad for retaining taken land.

Look up the Miyako Islands —there are almost 40,000 Japanese people living there, with airports totally capable of fielding the biggest PRC transports.

Many experts believe if China takes the Senkakus then they would ALSO have to take the Miyako Islands.

Some even say they’d have to take freaking OKINAWA.

You know what THAT means...


3 posted on 07/19/2015 12:51:44 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Everyone knows Okinawa, but few understand that legally that "state" extends considerably more south, to the Miyako Islands, almost all the way to TAIWAN:

See Yonaguni? That's maybe 20 miles from Taiwan, and it's 100% Japanese. It's uncontested.

If China made a play for ANYTHING, it's very, very likely there and other islands would HAVE to come under attack.

4 posted on 07/19/2015 12:55:44 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
The key passage in the article is:

"With the United States not even a member of UNCLOS"

Both Bush and Obama tried and failed to get the senate to ratify UNCLOS.

5 posted on 07/19/2015 1:25:47 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

China deeply desires the ability exercised by the US & Great Britain, a true “Blue Water” Navy. Like the Soviet Union and its successor Russia, it is geographically stymied by choke points controlled by potential hostile nations. Japan controls from just below the Kamchatka Peninsula to Taiwan. Then you have the Philippine Islands leading to Indonesia, a literal ring around the China coastline.

Knowing the frustration of the Chinese leaders and their People Liberation Army Navy helps explain their desire to strike while Obama waffles! The South China Sea is a large basin with several CONSTRICTED exits but still an area with resources that China deeply desires to control! So making islands out of barely visible rocks and declaring 200 mile control radius is a good policy to the China Government.


6 posted on 07/19/2015 1:32:05 PM PDT by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson