Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Franklin Graham Responds: Gov’t to Fine Christian Bakers $135,000 for Declining Gay Wedding Cake
The Blaze ^ | July 7, 2015 | Billy Hollowell

Posted on 07/09/2015 6:36:33 AM PDT by Din Maker

Evangelist Franklin Graham, son of famed preacher Billy Graham, decried a decision by Oregon officials to fine bakers Aaron and Melissa Klein $135,000 for refusing to make a wedding cake for a lesbian couple, calling it “unbelievable.”

“Brad Avakian, Oregon’s Bureau of Labor & Industries Commissioner, upheld the ruling that the Kleins have to pay the lesbian couple $135,000 for a long list of alleged damages including: ‘acute loss of confidence,’ ‘high blood pressure,’ ‘impaired digestion,’ ‘loss of appetite,’ ‘migraine headaches,’ ‘pale and sick at home after work,’ ‘resumption of smoking habit,’ ‘weight gain,’ and ‘worry,’” Graham wrote. “Give me a break.”

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: franklingraham; gayweddingcake; oregon; weddingcake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
NOTICE: It said "Christian Bakers". Let's see how many Muslim-owned bakeries they will fine.
1 posted on 07/09/2015 6:36:33 AM PDT by Din Maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

Calling all Oregon FReepers: Even if you’re not gay, go to a Muslim-owned bakery and order a Wedding Cake for a gay wedding. Then sue them and make $135,000.


2 posted on 07/09/2015 6:38:02 AM PDT by Din Maker (GOP Gov. Susana Martinez of New Mexico for VP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law

“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States . . . shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”

Any government official punishing a church, minister, bakery, baker, florist, photographer, or other individual or organization for refusing to engage in expressive service or conduct contrary to their religious beliefs is engaged in one of the most heinous felonies imaginable. There are not many crimes serious enough to merit the death penalty, but that sort of persecution - abusing governmental power in the denial of God-given rights - is serious enough to merit capital punishment.

The bullies who abuse the government’s power in the gay “marriage” cause should feel the full force of the law, on the receiving end. Then their (surviving) sympathizers would understand just how evil their totalitarian actions really are. It’s time for thugs like Brad Avakian, Oregon’s Bureau of Labor & Industries Commissioner, to back off or face serious consequences.


3 posted on 07/09/2015 6:39:43 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

It’s not a “gay” wedding cake.
It’s a cake for a same-sex wedding.

Language is important.


4 posted on 07/09/2015 6:40:58 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

I’m surprised that they didn’t include “BAD HANG NAILS” to all of this. These voters will rue the day that they voted for all of these LIBERALS, SOCIALISTS and COMMUNISTS. Today, these people are attacking the defenseless Christians, tomorrow they;ll be attacking some one else. Until there will come a day when they’ll be attacking these voters, and there will be no one to defend them.


5 posted on 07/09/2015 6:43:17 AM PDT by gingerbread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Avakian’s payback is coming. When it does he will go down in flames.


6 posted on 07/09/2015 6:45:42 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

How did the plaintiffs have weight gain when they lost their appetite?


7 posted on 07/09/2015 6:46:09 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

If government officials were actually charged and prosecuted for violating that law, at least 3/4ths of government workers would be able to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

For this reason, it would never happen in the absence of J6P taking the Jeffersonian option.


8 posted on 07/09/2015 6:46:43 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Their lawyer just pulled that out of a book. The judge had already made the decision before the doors even opened.


9 posted on 07/09/2015 6:47:22 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker; Windflier; shibumi; Finny; Norm Lenhart; RitaOK

The fruitcakes’ lawyer forgot to include as consequential damages bad breath, skid marks in their underwear and the development of an overly butch and lipstick image in the community and, not only those awful sufferings but they also had their “feelings” hurt.


10 posted on 07/09/2015 6:50:40 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

We aren’t supposed to question authority, just fall in line.


11 posted on 07/09/2015 6:52:13 AM PDT by mothball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

Church leaders, including Franklin Graham, promised civil disobedience and would have an actionable plan for us before the Obergefell v Hodges decision.

Well, where’s the actionable plan? “Decry” an Oregon decision seems like weak sauce to me. Is that the best Church leaders can do?


12 posted on 07/09/2015 6:55:09 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker
‘acute loss of confidence,’ ‘high blood pressure,’ ‘impaired digestion,’ ‘loss of appetite,’ ‘migraine headaches,’ ‘pale and sick at home after work,’ ‘resumption of smoking habit,’ ‘weight gain,’ and ‘worry,’

I get all those symptoms just from hearing about little boys putting their peckers into each other's orifices.

13 posted on 07/09/2015 6:56:12 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
How did the plaintiffs have weight gain when they lost their appetite?

Good question. Maybe they were complaints by the two different women. There were 88 complaints by the one woman and 90 by the other....so in all the two women claimed they were damaged in 178 different ways. There was no doctor, no psychiatrist, just their "claims".

The list that is quoted in this article is laughable. Felt mentally raped? They should be ashamed to claim that....unless they are a rape survivor they do not what know what that even feels like.
14 posted on 07/09/2015 7:03:20 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

Obama owes every Conservative in America damages for high blood pressure, to say the least (Smiles)


15 posted on 07/09/2015 7:06:57 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

You may be right. I used to be a secretary to lawyers specializing in representing defendants in civil actions. I could write a book about some of the bogus “injuries” and “damages” plaintiffs have claimed.


16 posted on 07/09/2015 7:07:00 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

Just reading about this travesty of justice and what it says about American religious freedom gives me half these symptoms. Can I get $65000 in compensation from Avakian and the two anti-Christian women?


17 posted on 07/09/2015 7:10:06 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot; Din Maker
Well, where’s the actionable plan? “Decry” an Oregon decision seems like weak sauce to me. Is that the best Church leaders can do?

Easy for you to say. Did you make an effort yourself to rally to his side? What are you doing actively to oppose this, Sir Picks-a lot?

Here's a guy whose stepping up attempting to rally people in opposition, and the best he seems to get is the likes of you sitting at your lazy assed computer throwing spit balls at him.

What are you doing to actually lay yourself on the line?

 photo million-vet-march.jpg

18 posted on 07/09/2015 7:12:18 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

so when you go to a Garage to get your Brakes fixed and they say , “we don’t do Brakes” , you can Sue big time ?


19 posted on 07/09/2015 7:25:54 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

Gee, that list of ills sounds like what most people deal with on a daily basis just from the stress of Obama’s world being forced down humanity’s throat... why can’t I sue Obama for turning my world upside down? Huh?


20 posted on 07/09/2015 7:28:33 AM PDT by dps.inspect (rage against the Obama machine...lief systems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson