Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

District Judge to Brady Campaign: Quit Suing Companies For Selling Ammo
breitbart.com ^ | 6/29/2015 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 06/30/2015 8:05:12 AM PDT by rktman

It is apparent that this case was filed to pursue the political purposes of the Brady Center, and, given the failure to present any cognizable legal claim, bringing these defendants into the Colorado court where the prosecution of James Holmes was proceeding appears to be more of an opportunity to propagandize the public and stigmatize the defendants than to obtain a court order which counsel should have known would be outside the authority of this court.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2a; ammocontrol; banglist; guncontrol
That's what they do. I believe the ruling is under appeal so LuckyGunner may never see any monetary funds which they have stated they will donate to some pro-gun organization. Not to mention the judge is probably on someones s**t list now.
1 posted on 06/30/2015 8:05:12 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Change tort laws to “looser pays”. That will change a lot of this harrassment cr@p.


2 posted on 06/30/2015 8:07:49 AM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TMA62

It was changed. This sort of suit is not legal and the Brady campaign has made it abundantly clear that they have no respect for the rule of law. that’s why they owe lucky gunner $200k for legal expenses.


3 posted on 06/30/2015 8:10:20 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman
The judge is saying that the Brady Centers attorneys knew what they were doing was bull----. So why aren't they being made to pay --personally-- and why isn't the judge asking to have them disbarred?

Oh, I forgot, they're part of the untouchable legal profession, which means (no matter what), The Client Always Pays ™.

4 posted on 06/30/2015 8:30:26 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

I have always wanted the “Loser Pay” to mean ONLY the lawyers pay, as they know they have no CASE.


5 posted on 06/30/2015 8:43:17 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Lawfare.

Weaponized legal proceedings designed to shut down resistance to The Agenda.


6 posted on 06/30/2015 8:51:01 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

AWARD THEM DAMAGES


7 posted on 06/30/2015 9:09:53 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz - to defeat HilLIARy/Warren)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

It would be great- you cannot represent yourself in court any more (you can but the judges will hate you for it)

and so you ONLY can rely on a lawyer- if he says its OK to proceed, he’s at least as equally guilty of filing fraudulent claims


8 posted on 06/30/2015 9:11:25 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz - to defeat HilLIARy/Warren)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
agree, but I think HE is entirely responsible as HE knows better.

Three reasons he needs to pay all of it: 1.He knows better.

2. He does it anyway, and insults the Courts.

3.He does it anyway insults the courts and leaves his client to look like the fool.

The client now has that on his court records, which will come into play when and if he ever has a leg imitate claim, or a job interview.

9 posted on 06/30/2015 9:21:03 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TMA62

LOSER instead of looser.


10 posted on 06/30/2015 9:30:59 AM PDT by MEG33 (God Bless America And Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

I would be all for that!!! if the ,lawyer should have known, and let the client do it anyway


11 posted on 06/30/2015 9:51:36 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz - to defeat HilLIARy/Warren)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

The Lawyer ALWAYS should have know....he’s the one with the degree, no excuses...........


12 posted on 06/30/2015 9:57:56 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson