Skip to comments.
Justices rule for Texas in dispute over license plate [SCOTUS:Texas can ban confederate plates]
Austin Statesman ^
| 06/18/2015
| AP
Posted on 06/18/2015 7:34:12 AM PDT by GIdget2004
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: The people have spoken
Thats an odd coalition. I thought the same thing. Thomas does not often vote with Ginsberg, Kagan, and Sotomayer unless it is a relatively "no brainer" unanimous vote.
I'm a bit too apathetic to get worked up about this decision. I really don't see this as a First Amendment issue.
Probably more to the point, I will not rail against any decision in which Clarence Thomas was the deciding vote. Out of principal, if nothing else.
21
posted on
06/18/2015 8:48:53 AM PDT
by
TontoKowalski
(Satisfied Customer #291)
To: SaxxonWoods
Texas was a union state during the civil war. I think you should do a bit more research on this.
22
posted on
06/18/2015 8:52:23 AM PDT
by
TontoKowalski
(Satisfied Customer #291)
To: TontoKowalski
That fellow most likely has had too much yankee educating.
General John Bell Hood
23
posted on
06/18/2015 8:57:43 AM PDT
by
Covenantor
("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
To: GIdget2004
The court's majority on the Texas license plate case: Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Clarence Thomas Like it or not it's a 10th Amendment issue. Texas can control their license plates how they want. Alito is arguing it was a 1st Amendment issue and I'm not sure I'd agree.
To: centurion316
To: SaxxonWoods
Texas was a union state during the civil war. Wuh?
To: TontoKowalski
Though it should be noted that Governor Sam Houston opposed succession, and was forced from office by the rebels.
27
posted on
06/18/2015 9:05:56 AM PDT
by
GreenLanternCorps
(Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
To: GreenLanternCorps
Id be interested in learning more about this. I'm not a Texan, but the history of the Republic and early Statehood is worth studying.
However, even a non-Texan should know which side Texas was on. One of the Union's big priorities was to secure enough geography to effectively cut Texas out of the War.
I don't think Lincoln wanted to tangle with that bobcat.
28
posted on
06/18/2015 9:12:21 AM PDT
by
TontoKowalski
(Satisfied Customer #291)
To: GIdget2004
It’s becoming loud and clear that free speech only applies to the political left.
29
posted on
06/18/2015 9:19:47 AM PDT
by
catfish1957
(Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
To: max americana
the license plate would offend many Texans. not that it matters much but many "Texans" moved here during Katrina.
30
posted on
06/18/2015 9:23:18 AM PDT
by
showme_the_Glory
((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
To: SaxxonWoods
State Date of Secession
South Carolina December 20, 1860
Mississippi January 9, 1861
Florida January 10, 1861
Alabama January 11, 1861
Georgia January 19, 1861
Louisiana January 26, 1861
Texas February 1, 1861
Virginia April 17, 1861
Arkansas May 6, 1861
North Carolina May 20, 1861
Tennessee June 8, 1861
31
posted on
06/18/2015 9:27:00 AM PDT
by
SolidRedState
(I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
To: central_va
32
posted on
06/18/2015 9:35:30 AM PDT
by
mrsmel
(One Who Can See)
To: SaxxonWoods
Methinks you forgot the sarcasm tag. lol
33
posted on
06/18/2015 9:39:32 AM PDT
by
Night Hides Not
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
To: OriginalChristian
This shouldve been settled by Texas. Period.You realize that it was Texas that refused to allow the license plate? And that SCOTUS affirmed Texas's decision?
To: BuckeyeTexan
To: dware
The way I read it is the government just ruled individuals don’t have free speech on something they’re forced by law to purchase because it might offend someone. But they allow people to put filth on the plates all the time. Personally, ALL personalized license plates offend me because narcissists offend me.
36
posted on
06/18/2015 7:54:13 PM PDT
by
VerySadAmerican
(I'm very sad for my country. Personally, I've never been happier.)
To: Covenantor
Ft. Hood must be offensive to many people. How long before they change the name? I predict within a year.
37
posted on
06/18/2015 7:57:54 PM PDT
by
VerySadAmerican
(I'm very sad for my country. Personally, I've never been happier.)
To: Lurking Libertarian; OriginalChristian
This shouldve been settled by Texas. Period.
You realize that it was Texas that refused to allow the license plate? And that SCOTUS affirmed Texas's decision?
Exactly. I think SCOTUS decided this one correctly.
38
posted on
06/20/2015 8:16:58 AM PDT
by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
To: GIdget2004; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ..
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
39
posted on
06/22/2015 8:24:18 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: dware
Easily resolved with a bumper sticker.
40
posted on
06/22/2015 10:19:51 AM PDT
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson