Posted on 06/16/2015 1:44:17 PM PDT by GIdget2004
If you are going to post a thread at least comment on why you did. Otherwise people might think to a democratic operative. Understand noob?
adjective
1. tending to compel, as to force or push toward a course of action; overpowering:
There were compelling reasons for their divorce.
2. having a powerful and irresistible effect; requiring acute admiration, attention, or respect:
a man of compelling integrity; a compelling drama.
Reagan 2.0?
You mean that divorced former Democrat whose kids, Ron and Patti particularly, were a constant source of embarrassment?
And you’re worried about Palin’s kids?
Judging by the reactions of some fellow FReepers, I apparently touched a nerve saying anything critical, though true, of Sarah Palin ‘ s political future.
I’m sure you know Reagan was already president when his rebelous adult children became a thorn in his side.
I also don’t recall the police being dispatched to break up a drunken family brawl during Mr. Reagan ‘ s political life.
I don’t believe you can honestly compare Mr. Reagan to Mrs. Palin in accomplishment, results, political trajectory, and dignity factor.
Your retort serves as a reminder, that for a number of fellow FReepers here, she is off limits to any pragmatic comments.
I will be more reverent going forward.
“Reagan 2.0?
You mean that divorced former Democrat whose kids, Ron and Patti particularly, were a constant source of embarrassment?
And you’re worried about Palin’s kids?”
It certainly”compelled” her to post about it.
“Bazinga!”
A sloppy use of the adjective. I sincerely doubt she was "compelled" to post it. She did it because she had a desire to.
One could write, for example, about how Rachel Dolezal was "compelled" to pose as a black woman. That would be an accurate use of the term. Notwithstanding some desire to negatively slant her writings, I wouldn't categorize Palin's blog postings as being motivated by some "compelling" need.
Long walk, short pier...
She probably should have guessed that a public compliment the day after an announcement of candidacy would be construed as an endorsement.
See #10.
Sigh...
So what?
It’s unfortunate, but you almost always have to use a sarc tag to shield yourself from the knee-jerk posting crowd these days...
Yeah, I thought the “let me be first” would be clue enough. The whole business of writing people off as RINOs because they disagree on one thing is way out of hand. I call it being “conservatively correct”, as if a person’s whole life can be boiled down to a checklist of political positions.
Sorry
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.