Posted on 06/15/2015 11:48:43 AM PDT by Mozilla
In the two years since the Edward Snowden saga went public, a handful of people who actually understand the Western signals intelligence system have tried to explain the many ways that the Snowden Operation has smeared NSA and its partners with salacious charges of criminality and abuse. I’ve been one of the public faces of what may be called the Snowden Truth movement, and finally there are signs that reality may be intruding on this debate.
No American ally was rocked harder by Snowden’s allegations than Germany, which has endured a bout of hysteria over charges that NSA was listening in on senior German officials, including Chancellor Angela Merkel. Although these stories included a good deal of bunkum from the start, they caused a firestorm in Germany, particularly the alleged spying on Merkel, which was termed Handygate by the media.
In response, Germany tasked Federal prosecutors with looking into the matter and, they if determined there was sufficient evidence, to press charges against NSA for breaking stringent German privacy laws. The investigation, led by Harald Range, Germany’s attorney general, has been slow and diligent, examining all possible evidence about NSA spying on Germany. Here Snowden’s purloined information would play a key role.
However, the matter has become politically fraught. In the first place, senior German security officials were circumspect about the case, since Berlin is heavily dependent on NSA for intelligence on vital matters like terrorism. Worse, follow-on Snowden revelations showed that the BND, German’s foreign intelligence service, and NSA are close partners, and the BND has itself been spying on EU neighbor states that are friendly to Germany such as Austria, Belgium, and the Netherlands.
To top it off, last month’s major hack of the Bundestag, Germany’s parliament, turns out to have been the work of Russians, apparently state-sponsored. In reality, the major spy threats to Germany are not NSA, but Russians and Chinese, as I’ve been saying for some time — and, to be fair, so have German security officials, though they got drowned out in the public hysteria over Snowden.
Now we learn that Range’s prosecutors are dropping their year-long Handygate inquiry, for want of hard evidence. Federal prosecutors in Karlsruhe aren’t saying much, beyond that they simply don’t have evidence of spying that would stand up in court. Back in December, Attorney General Range offered a warning about the dubious nature of much of the “evidence” against NSA:
The document presented in public as proof of an actual tapping of the mobile phone is not an authentic surveillance order by the NSA. It does not come from the NSA database. There is no proof at the moment which could lead to charges that Chancellor Merkel’s phone connection data was collected or her calls tapped.
Got that? That’s the polite, legalistic way of saying the Snowden claims are backed by faked NSA documents, as has been clear for some time to anybody who understands counterintelligence and the SIGINT system. This should surprise no one, since using fake or doctored Western intelligence documents to embarrass democracies is a venerable tradition for Russian intelligence — the proper espionage term is Active Measures — and since Snowden’s been in Moscow for the last two years and shows no signs of going anywhere else anytime soon, two and two can be added together here.
To make matters worse for Snowden’s fans, a report about the Handygate inquiry being dropped in the magazine Der Spiegel, which has been a key player in the Snowden Operation, includes the painful truth. While some have clamored to get Snowden out of Moscow to testify before prosecutors, Berlin understood how politically tricky that would be. Moreover, prosecutors determined that Ed simply didn’t have much to say.
As a prosecutor explained, Snowden provided “no evidence that he has his own knowledge” (keine Hinweise dafür, dass er über eigene Kenntnisse verfügt). In other words, Ed doesn’t actually know what he’s talking about. This is not news to anybody who understands how NSA and the Allied SIGINT system actually work.
Snowden was an IT guy, not a SIGINT analyst, and in his final position he was working as a contracted infrastructure analyst for NSA’s Information Assurance arm, i.e. the Agency’s defensive side, which protects classified U.S. communications networks. Snowden was never a SIGINTer, working on the intelligence collection side of the house, and he doesn’t seem to understand how that complex system, built over decades, actually functions.
This is why Snowden has made so many odd, contradictory, and even outlandish statements over the past couple years about SIGINT, which have caused those who actually understand how NSA works to scratch their heads … Ed doesn’t know any better.
It’s been obvious for some time to insiders that, for reasons we still don’t fully understand, Snowden decided to steal something like 1.7 million classified documents from NSA servers through internal hacks. About 900,000 of those documents came from the Pentagon and have nothing to do with intelligence matters.
There’s no way Snowden could have read more than a tiny fraction of what he stole, nobody has that much time, and it’s clear now that Ed, an IT guy and a thief, who was never any sort of “spy” as he portrays himself, would not have understood all those NSA documents he made off with anyway.
Snowden’s been living under the protection of Putin’s Federal Security Service now for two years, functioning as a pawn of Russian intelligence. When his secret relationship with the Kremlin started remains an open question, but that he has one now can only be denied by the foolish (witness the weak lies told by his supporters about Ed’s FSB ties), since when you defect, you wind up in the care of that country’s security service. That’s how it works in America, and I don’t hear anybody seriously suggesting that Putin’s Kremlin is more liberal in these matters than the FBI or CIA.
In light of these revelations from Germany, it’s worth pondering whether Ed was always just a pawn, a talking head, for others with agendas to harm Western security. As we’re now in the Cold War 2.0 with Russia that I warned you about after Putin’s theft of Crimea, this seems like a more than academic question.
For two years now, I’ve been trying to inform the public about what’s really going on behind the Snowden Operation, using my understanding of how the SpyWar actually functions, and I’ve gotten a lot of grief for it from Ed’s hardcore fans. News out of Germany can’t help but lead me to point out that, well … I told you so.
Well if he was a fraud he sure did have a lot if people bad mouthing and trying to chase him down for nothing then.
It is a decent article on the marginal character of Snowden. What amazed me about this guy is that he was a software engineer at best. He had no background....no indepth experience as an ethics professional....no intelligence background.....no concept over the relationships built in the intelligence process. But he wants to “fix” what is broke? A twenty-something guy wanting to tell me how to fix NSA? At that point, he lost his credible nature and whole point.
Adding to this....he wanted to assure me that he had the resources to protect all the secrets he stole....twenty-four hours a day....seven days a week....and it was all encrypted by his process. The Chinese and Russians have a thousand engineers at their disposal each.....who are as bright as Snowden or brighter....and likely given the task of breaking his encryption method....whether it takes days, weeks or months. Once he removed the data....he was simply baiting them to take him on and crack the code. He was foolish in believing he was better than everyone else.
“the Snowden Operation has smeared NSA and its partners with salacious charges of criminality and abuse.”
Raise your hand if you can’t believe the NSA is criminal and abusive? LOL!
Dude - If Europe REALLY knew what we were doing, we’d be kicked out of every country over there. That’s all I got to say.
He’s a traitor and i hope special forces puts a bullet in his head one day. And if his gal gets in the way, well, too bad.
I respect those who agree with what he did, as they are fellow FReepers, but I will never, ever consider him a hero.
Heroes for the US don’t live out their days in Russia. Russia does NOTHING for any American out of the goodness of their heart.
Which means the NSA is 100% correct in spying on Americans? What a crock.
No, it means Snowden does not, as in individual, have useful or relevant knowledge about the spying allegations in Germany outside the NSA docs he provided.
The size and scope of our spy agencies has grown out of control with the size and scope of our governments....all governments.
Rather than keep expanding our spying, perhaps we should be focusing on securing our data from the Russians and Chinese (two among the thousands who are trying to break our systems).
You first need to secure your defense before you go out on offense.
Intelligence is good, but today it is too broad and generalized. It should be like a precision missile strike, not like a shotgun.
Stated like a true jackboot licking statist. How can you NOT be happy with his revelations? I mean, honestly, what you are saying is that he should have kept his mouth shut about NSA spying, on Americans. Nice. Screw Americans. We don't have ANY need to know what our Government is doing. Or at least, so say the Snowden haters.
I’ve been called worse. Of course you know there were other ways he could have gone about making this known. And I am expecting the usual responses....”he did try” “who would listen”.
Doesn’t excuse treason. Have a good one!
I wouldn't be surprised if there were a few people who encouraged him to be a whistle-blower but who we'll never hear about because it was their job to encourage him.
His not going about it the way they expected him to or even outlined for him is no different than the good Muzzies in Afghanistan who fought the Soviets backing the Taliban rather than continuing to go after the USSR right away.
Yeah, I know, tin foil hat territory, but handing Libya over to Jihadists after Quack Daffy was being cooperative and helping to install the MB in Egypt were both tin foil hat territory at one time, too.
JMHo
Before Snowden was ever charged news of the NSA’s Secret Bulk Data Collecting had ‘already’ been exposed by Leslie Cauley at USA Today in May of 2006..... It’s not like it was a secret this was going on ..... Snowden simply contacted the Guardian and ‘they created the story’ and it went from there......
HE did nothing but put peoples in jepordy, not just here but in other countries as well.....
Snowden’s no hero...he simply wanted the press and got it.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm
I’m sure Snowden read every word of the millions of documents he stole before he ran off to be protected by Putin, who is helping him because he’s such a swell guy, and secret supporter of the American republic.
I would have some respect for the guy if he would stayed here and fought the good fight...but that would have required courage, a quality Snowden is a stranger to.
I assume the author, John Schindler, is the fomer NSA spook who “resigned” from the Naval War College after it was discovered he was sending photos of his genitalia to a woman not his wife?
Well if he was a fraud he sure did have a lot if people bad mouthing and trying to chase him down for nothing then.
That’s how Obama supporters believe regarding Obama.
“Courage” in the face of being assassinated is not courage, but stupidity.
Snowden is a NATIONAL HERO
Snowden is as real as Sandy Hoax. Both are conspiracies to FORWARD an agenda. Home grown, right here in DC among a small circle of Fascists seeking to overthrow America and its security apparatus.
A “national hero” who voluntarily moved to RUSSIA?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.