Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stakes Are High as Supreme Court Nears Obamacare Decision
St. Louis Today ^ | June 7, 2015 | Jordan Shapiro

Posted on 06/07/2015 3:58:35 PM PDT by SteveH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: political1

“The vast majority of people will just go on and get their insurance somewhere else.”
true the ones that lost their coverage then had to get worse coverage. Problem tho the incos have to file with state ID for plan details. this usually take a while. also the subsidies are paid to the inscos so will they be dropping the subsidized members.


41 posted on 06/07/2015 8:55:07 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

So what’s next if/when both homosexual marriage and obamacare are decided against the Constitution? It seems likely. Oncwe bought can Roberts render himself UNbought?


42 posted on 06/07/2015 10:25:37 PM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: impactplayer

The original obamacare decision was regarded as in the bag for the Constitution then Roberts got some news that alarmed him and flipped. I am sure that information that changed his mind will keep it changed. Are we counting on Ginsberg to go our way?


43 posted on 06/07/2015 10:27:35 PM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

People i speak to about this subject only see Obama’s achievement being struck down. The capricious way it’s been implemented, the changes he’s made on his own, they don’t understand the consequences. The man has spent over 6 years doing whatever he wants handing down decree’s like a 12th century king. Whats amazing is how little effect 2 big election losses have had on him and manner of going about being president. He feels there are no boundaries, no limits on his power. Of course were it a Republican president he would be screaming about the injustice of it all.


44 posted on 06/07/2015 11:24:38 PM PDT by wiggen (#JeSuisCharlie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
 photo gty_john_roberts_obama_jef_120628_wblog.jpg
45 posted on 06/08/2015 3:55:55 AM PDT by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

46 posted on 06/08/2015 5:48:17 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I am not convinced Roberts will flip this time. Congress (wisely, I think) has singled that they will act to prevent a disaster - even with a short term extension if required. That was not the case last time. There was no way congress was going to do anything, and that alarmed Roberts. I believe the coalition will hold this time - we shall see.


47 posted on 06/08/2015 6:23:39 AM PDT by impactplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: impactplayer

It wouldn’t be a “flip” this time, but rather the new consistency.


48 posted on 06/08/2015 7:56:22 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

“It’s unclear how the court will rule” Um, so long as the regime holds the pirate Roberts’ blackmail file, it is quite clear how the court will rule. This is pure kabuki theater.


49 posted on 06/08/2015 8:02:02 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all realtive, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardens Hollow

thanks


50 posted on 06/08/2015 8:24:06 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: impactplayer
They have already decided - they are just writing it up now. In the past it has been alleged that Justice Sonia Sotomayor leaks decisions to the President. Starting last week, the President went on an offensive describing the chaos which would ensue if the ruling goes against them. I therefore conclude that the ruling has gone against them and they are trying to apply pressure for a last minute change (they believe this worked in the original Obama Care ruling with Judge Roberts). Pray that the justices hold their ground!!

This is how I read it as well, that someone tipped off the WH the ruling is against them, so far. Unfortunately, the ruling changed at the last minute before due to lobbying, apparently, setting a very bad precedent.

51 posted on 06/08/2015 8:27:07 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman

puke and punk


52 posted on 06/08/2015 10:31:06 AM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson