Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House bill would require gun owners to have liability insurance
The Hill ^ | May 29, 2015 | Lydia Wheeler

Posted on 05/29/2015 12:47:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

(VIDEO-AT-LINK)

House Democrat Rep. Carolyn Maloney (N.Y.) has introduced a bill that would require gun owners to carry liability insurance.

The Firearm Risk Protection Act, unveiled Friday, would require gun buyers to have liability insurance coverage before being allowed to purchase a weapon, and would impose a fine of $10,000 if an owner is found not to have it. Service members and law enforcement officers, however, would be exempt from the requirement.

“We require insurance to own a car, but no such requirement exists for guns," Maloney said in a statement. "The results are clear: car fatalities have declined by 25 percent in the last decade, but gun fatalities continue to rise.”

Maloney said auto insurance carriers incentivize drivers to take precautions to reduce accidents, but no such incentives exist for firearm owners.

“An insurance requirement would allow the free market to encourage cautious behavior and help save lives,” she said. “Adequate liability coverage would also ensure that the victims of gun violence are fairly compensated when crimes or accidents occur."

This is the second time Maloney, who is one of the biggest gun control advocates in Congress, has introduced the legislation. A few weeks ago she reintroduced legislation that would require sellers to obtain a background check for all guns sold at gun shows.

The Gun Show Loophole Closing Act, long championed by former Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), would subject anyone selling or transferring a gun to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System and require that transfers be reported to the attorney general.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; democrats; gunownersinsurance; housebill; insurance; maloney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
No wonder they lose seats every two years.
1 posted on 05/29/2015 12:47:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We require insurance to own a car

No we don't. We require insurance to drive on public roads, not to own a vehicle or drive it on private property.

2 posted on 05/29/2015 12:49:27 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Can we please require criminals to have insurance as well?

/sarc


3 posted on 05/29/2015 12:50:03 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m sure most ‘gang-bangers’ and criminals are going to run like the Flash to the nearest insurance agency and buy a policy after the law is passed.


4 posted on 05/29/2015 12:50:05 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

And car insurance is required at the STATE level, where it belongs.


5 posted on 05/29/2015 12:50:19 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
... a bill that would require gun owners to carry liability insurance ...

The requirement is "infringement".

6 posted on 05/29/2015 12:50:24 PM PDT by Spirochete (GOP: Give Obama Power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So she thinks only the 1% should be able to defend themselves?


7 posted on 05/29/2015 12:51:20 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"The results are clear: car fatalities have declined by 25 percent in the last decade, but gun fatalities continue to rise.”

Ignorance, or barefaced lie?


8 posted on 05/29/2015 12:51:23 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If we need insurance for a 2nd Amendment right, then we also need:


9 posted on 05/29/2015 12:52:21 PM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think congress-critters should have to buy their own liability insurance. I think they should not be prevented from entering office until they show they have prepaid coverage for the entire term to which they have been elected plus twenty years.


10 posted on 05/29/2015 12:52:59 PM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

we the people need some insurance to protect us form illegal actions by our elected. Maybe the politicians should have some performance bonding like some companies.

I support a two term system in politics but I want the second term to be in prison.


11 posted on 05/29/2015 12:53:22 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What gun? How about a daily ‘hood canvas for illegal gunz?


12 posted on 05/29/2015 12:53:48 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Well, she IS from New York. There’s no telling what kind of draconian insurance laws they have in her state.


13 posted on 05/29/2015 12:53:49 PM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Demonicrat politicans should be required to have liability insurance to cover the damage to citizens when the politicians commit treason.


14 posted on 05/29/2015 12:54:23 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
She's comparing the guns Americans keep in their homes to the cars they drive on public streets?

This dingbat should be drug tested.

15 posted on 05/29/2015 12:54:38 PM PDT by South40 (Hillary Clinton was a "great secretary of state". - Texas Governor Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Need to include vehicular deaths.


16 posted on 05/29/2015 12:55:30 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So you really do end up with a national gun registry. It’s just held and maintained by the insurance companies. Which will trip all over themselves to send it in when the first subponea hits.

On top of that, what happens when the insurance companies decline to provide coverage? Or jack up rates to the point where it becomes cost prohibitive for the average person to own a gun?

This woman, btw, isn’t an idiot. She just thinks the rest of us are.


17 posted on 05/29/2015 12:55:52 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

Doesnt Ill already have that for their governators?


18 posted on 05/29/2015 12:56:39 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“We require insurance to own a car, but no such requirement exists for guns," Maloney said in a statement. "The results are clear: car fatalities have declined by 25 percent in the last decade, but gun fatalities continue to rise.”

omg. The stupid, it hurts! Car fatalities have NOT declined because of insurance. Automobile insurance has been around a LOT longer than "the last decade."

How about improved vehicle design or more seat belt use . . . anything but insurance premiums. Seriously, how is it possible for someone to be so dumb?

19 posted on 05/29/2015 12:56:45 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We should require Congressites to have liability insurance for the crap they pull. Oh yeah, I guess it’s called “immunity”.


20 posted on 05/29/2015 12:57:05 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson