Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY CLINTON AND THE SUPREME COURT
Catholic Vote ^ | May 15, 2015 | CARSON HOLLOWAY

Posted on 05/16/2015 3:55:19 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: NYer
She plans to do a lot of her work through executive order.

More than Obama.

21 posted on 05/16/2015 8:30:41 PM PDT by Slyfox (If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Please Pray This Week for Traditional Marriage – The Supreme Court Is in Session
22 posted on 05/16/2015 8:38:04 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Regards my tagline;

I don’t keep track of the mean spirited Cruz posters who congregate on the Walker threads, so I have no idea if you are one or not. I simply call them ‘The Cruz Contingent’.

The mere fact that you commented on the tagline as you did would indicates that you are probably NOT one of those who I pointed at.

If you were, your response would be more along the lines of what I got a long time ago. I am paraphrasing, but I’m not far off from the actual words used. It went something like this, ‘We don’t have time to convince you about Cruz, get the hell out of our way’.

Compare nearly any Cruz thread with nearly any Walker thread. You’ll see a very large number of Cruz ‘re-educators’ on the Walker threads, something that doesn’t happen in reverse.

By ‘re-educators’ I’m talking about mean spirited attacks, rather than discussions and questions about political positions. The attacks are worded in such a way that they appear to be designed ‘educate’ the reader not to question the posters knowledge.

To the question I ask in my tagline; from what I’ve seen of Cruz, he isn’t as mean spirited. He appears to be just the opposite.

Which is why I ask the question.


23 posted on 05/17/2015 9:08:35 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Is Ted Cruz himself as mean-spirited as the FR 'Click-it or Tick-it' Cruz Contingent?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Thank you for your reasoned response.

I’m not always a big fan of some of the comments others make on Walker threads.

I may agree with them, but the wording and tactics wouldn’t be my choice.

That doesn’t mean I don’t think there’s fertile ground there. I just want some real reasons provided. If they are, I have much less of a problem with them.


24 posted on 05/17/2015 12:19:03 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I put a lot of thought into that line, born out of frustration.

It’s darn near impossible for me to find a thread about my guy Walker without seeing it turned into a shit-slinging contest by the Cruz Contingent.


25 posted on 05/17/2015 2:57:42 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Is Ted Cruz himself as mean-spirited as the FR 'Click-it or Tick-it' Cruz Contingent?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

If Walker is open to criticism on merit, I’m not against it if it is topical on the thread.

For instance I don’t go posting his immigration problem on non-immigration threads.

When the thread heralds his great stance on immigration, I jump in.

I know this is a real pain. It’s the season for it I guess. I don’t want to see this later in the year. Hopefully we won’t have twenty guys heading into the primaries.


26 posted on 05/17/2015 6:21:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

You’re in denial. That isn’t what happens.

Even the most cursor glance at the threads can tell you that it turns into a Cruz-Contingent sponsored shit storm.

Have a good evening.


27 posted on 05/17/2015 7:20:16 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Is Ted Cruz himself as mean-spirited as the FR 'Click-it or Tick-it' Cruz Contingent?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

I wasn’t saying what you described doesn’t take place.

I’m not sure why you objected to my response.


28 posted on 05/17/2015 7:21:44 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Your words sounded like denial to me.

Sorry, I jumped to a wrong conclusion.


29 posted on 05/17/2015 7:25:44 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Is Ted Cruz himself as mean-spirited as the FR 'Click-it or Tick-it' Cruz Contingent?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

I explained in another post that I don’t always agree with other folk’s methods.

Here I more or less explained what guideline I try to go by.


30 posted on 05/17/2015 7:27:21 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson