Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wells Fargo ad to feature a lesbian couple
wyff4.com ^ | April 23, 2015

Posted on 05/05/2015 3:51:10 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Pining_4_TX
Unfortunately, we’re not going to be able to avoid this propaganda.

Actually, it can be stopped rather easily by executing the propagandists.

All it takes is a man with a plan.

41 posted on 05/05/2015 10:09:58 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Wait, the women are a threesome?

Why not show real-life women such as Rosie O’ Donnell?


42 posted on 05/06/2015 4:07:59 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

There’s no reason for government and a lot of businesses to promote polygamy, because it gets complicated with so many people and it gives an unfair advantage monetarily to those with so many spouses and children. There’s kind of a reason why even homosexuals generally only ask for one at a time when it comes to legal and business recognition.


43 posted on 05/06/2015 4:11:17 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

What I don’t understand from a business standpoint is why alienate so many just to try to please a few? And will this dumb commercial really bring more homo customers? I think there are probably some homosexuals in charge of advertising who are behind this. And looking at the women in the commercial, I am pretty sure they are just actresses. And the poor little girl.


44 posted on 05/06/2015 5:53:49 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Where do the children come from? Does anyone ever ask that question?


45 posted on 05/06/2015 10:01:56 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

“So they’re pandering to less than 2% of the population and pissing off 98%. Good marketing decision.”

It’s not about the 2%. It’s about the other 59% who agree with them. That’s what we fail to understand, that we’re no longer in the majority here. Companies don’t pander to groups like this out of some sense of social agenda, they do it because the numbers tell them it’s money to do it.

If we can’t admit that we’ve lost the country, we have no hope of pulling the American people back on our side.


46 posted on 05/06/2015 6:41:34 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson