Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama immigration orders face major test in federal court
Roll Call ^ | April 16, 2015 | Jordan Fabian

Posted on 04/17/2015 10:25:35 AM PDT by don-o

President Obama’s executive actions on immigration will be tested on Friday when a federal appeals court considers whether to lift an order blocking the actions to allow millions of immigrants without legal status to remain in the United States.

Lawyers from the federal government and 26 states opposed to Obama’s immigration policies will make oral arguments in front of a three-judge panel from the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans, the most conservative circuit in the country.

ADVERTISEMENT The administration is seeking an emergency stay lifting a Texas judge’s order freezing Obama’s November executive actions, which could provide deportation relief and work permits to as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants.

Supporters of Obama’s programs are hopeful the court’s recent dismissal of a separate lawsuit against the immigration programs are a sign the judges will be on their side.

The panel may take days or weeks to decide on the government’s motion.

If it lifts U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen’s preliminary injunction, the Obama administration could begin implementing its programs. If it does not, Obama’s actions will remain in limbo.

The atmosphere surrounding the hearing is expected to be charged. More than 150 people plan to demonstrate outside the courthouse, including immigrants eligible for relief under Obama’s programs, according to immigrant-rights groups.

With just 21 months in Obama’s presidency, his administration is acting aggressively to resolve the legal issues surrounding the immigration programs, a key part of his presidential legacy.

But Obama’s lawyers could face an uphill battle in court on Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; fifthcircuit; neworleans

1 posted on 04/17/2015 10:25:35 AM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ray76

ping


2 posted on 04/17/2015 10:25:56 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Patience... is so hard.. same with King v Burwell.....


3 posted on 04/17/2015 10:29:33 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

This isn’t the real test. The real test will come during the appeal from the actual trial on the issue. This is just an appeal of the TRO.


4 posted on 04/17/2015 10:32:49 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o; All

will the court announce a decision today?


5 posted on 04/17/2015 10:48:17 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Thanks


6 posted on 04/17/2015 10:55:12 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
Maybe the court will slap additional sanctions following Obama’s issuing 500,000 social security numbers to illegals.

Here's a flashback to the 1986 law on the books....

If the President proposes to make any change regarding social security account number cards, the President shall transmit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Finance of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change. The President promptly shall cause to have printed in the Federal Register the substance of any major change (described in subparagraph (D)) proposed and reported to Congress. "(B) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—In any report under subparagraph (A) the President shall include recommendations for the establishment of civil and criminal sanctions for unauthorized use or disclosure of the information or identifiers contained in such system.

"(C) CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF MAJOR CHANGES.—

"(i) HEARINGS AND REVIEW.—The Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate shall cause to have printed in the Congressional Record the substance of any major change described in subparagraph (D), shall hold hearings respecting the feasibility and desirability of implementing such a change, and, within the two year period before implementation, shall report to their respective Houses findings on whether or not such a change should be implemented.

This posted 11/22/14....Hat Tip to xzins

Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 "NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES" (Required)

Government Printing Office ^ | 1986 | US Congress Posted on 11/22/2014, 4:03:19 PM by xzins

Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 "NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES" (Required) Government Printing Office ^ | 1986 | US Congress

Posted on 11/22/2014, 4:03:19 PM by xzins

Discussion here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3230042/posts?page=83

7 posted on 04/17/2015 10:57:57 AM PDT by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: don-o

“We had concerns from the outset that the plaintiffs judge shopped to get Hanen and also knowing that this could very well end up in the Fifth Circuit on appeal,” said Marshall Fitz, vice president for immigration policy at the Center for American Progress, which has ties to the White House.

**************

Oh puh-leeze .... and the Dems never “shop” judges? The usual major hypocrisy.


8 posted on 04/17/2015 11:03:06 AM PDT by Qiviut ( One of the most delightful things about a garden is the anticipation it provides. ~W.E. Johns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Reading the article can be quite helpful....

“The panel may take days or weeks to decide on the government’s motion.”


9 posted on 04/17/2015 11:06:48 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: don-o
the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans, the most conservative circuit in the country.

Do they refer to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal in San Francisco, the most liberal circuit in the country?

10 posted on 04/17/2015 11:24:02 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

thanks...it turns my stomach to read anything about this immigration “issue”...i seethe with rage over the BS of it all hence try to stay clear except for the general headlines...


11 posted on 04/17/2015 11:30:54 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: don-o

I guess they’ll have to blackmail some more judges.


12 posted on 04/17/2015 12:06:58 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson