Posted on 03/30/2015 4:45:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Exactly.
There is a massive difference in a cake maker saying he wont making a wedding cake for a gay “marriage” and the same cake maker saying he wont make a birthday cake for someone who is gay (which I am not sure how he would even know that for sure)
Maybe. But the issue is a private property issue not a gay issue
Either way, he thinks he can say one thing to get elected and do the opposite once he’s in office. He’s proved that once.
What's to be confused about - he was clarifying so he would not be misunderstood.
Having a place cater to a homosexual-specific service (wedding cake, etc.,) can be denied based on religious grounds. If the same homosexuals (or whatever other sex act they may be relating themselves to) just want the same sort of service that anyone else may get (meal in restaurant, cake w/o accolades to a homosexual "wedding", they should not be denied because they are homosexual (or whatever sex act.....).
Yep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.