Posted on 03/14/2015 1:15:11 PM PDT by oleus
Edited on 03/14/2015 1:40:33 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
LOL!!!!
Well, the GOP isn’t ultimately The Stupid Party for nothing. Warren or Sanders might fire up the left like Hillary never will, but the GOPe is always willing to cross that bridge when they get to it. Just like they did in the mid-terms, many of them lying their lying azzes off re amnesty only to unashamedly support it immediately upon winning Congress, thereby infuriating millions of conservatives (not to mention the low-down dirty campaign they waged against Chris McDaniel and other conservatives in the election. They used the very same tactic-racebaiting-which is so successfully used by the left against them, thereby lending it more credence).
I think that’s because the Obamas are making this happen. The second I saw this gain traction without one Republican latching on, I knew it. Rush only got on it when it was clear he couldn’t be “blamed” for it, and I don’t fault him one bit for being cautious.
For me, the really intriguing thing will be if/how the Clintons try and fight back. It seems pretty clear to me that one side wants to completely destroy the other. The other side is being exposed for everything they are so if they have the goods, they will have to use them soon, or never.
It’s like watching Kanye West and Juster Bieber in an MMA fight to the death. One will live, but you hope the survivor won’t be able to make any music afterwards.
Or, Obama may be of the “apres moi le deluge” mentality, and this is just personal against Shillary.
Oh my,
Thanks oleus,
Oh my.
Yo bill and hill, up yours.
Emptiness cast no shadow.
True, but a whole lotta evil at one’s core might.
Yeah, even though reading that line the first time made me want to hurl, I almost thought it may have been a deeply subtle jab. It was carefully worded.
“It depends upon what the meaning of @ is.”
I think she probably wants that gem to go viral...not sure if she knows how to tweet, maybe i’ll steal or just tweet maureen if she is indeed on twitter lol
@oleus
What I see is the leftists looking for a more convincing liar. Hillary is not. Not of the “ Exceptionally good liar” caliber that her so-called husband is.
It "was" on property...? Where is it now, witch?
Ah, the meaning of "was."
“It’s a trap!!!”
Although gluttony and wallowing are clearly appropriate in describe the Hildebeast, “feminist icon” is an insult to many true feminists, such as:
Camille Paglia: “It remains baffling how anyone would think that Hillary Clinton is our party’s best chance”
That’s nice! She went to a party with her father!
Paglia is more intellectually honest than Dowd. But Dowd can do far more damage to them than Paglia could.
Paglia is a trip, although she lost me on her Taylor Swift is a bad role model stuff, presenting Rihanna as her ideal (her pop music dissection got really sloppy and ridiculous the more she went into those waters).
Exactly...he may be a crook, but he’s their crook.
But whose crooks are they now? And what kind of cattle futures are being traded now...I can only imagine
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.