Posted on 03/10/2015 5:10:29 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
You’re not as clever as you believe you are.
Recasting comments and attributing positions to others as it suit you exposes your intent.
Your difficulty trying to sound conservative and Tea Party-ish is obvious.
Go play somewhere else. I’m on to your tactics and your anemic attempts to portray that we are engaged in a conversation.
A college sophomore writes a sophomoric analysis on Scott Walker’s phonomenal success: change the legislature.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
Sound consevative? Too funny. If you met me, you would know that I am still proudly supporting Tea Party principles. You obviously don’t like my messaging because it is resonating for Cruz and not for Walker. If you were in my house right now, you would see my ragged, tshirts with Tea Party logos on them, albeit a little tighter because of my beer belly, and if you saw my voting record in WI, you would see that I voted for Walker. My conservative friends are going to howl in laughter at your buffooned attempt to silence a ‘real’ conservative. Oh, gad, puleeeze!!!
There are other FReepers with whom I can exchange ideas and volley ideas back and forth.
You’re a poster of a different stripe and I do not wish to engage.
Your “messaging” is “off” - it rings false flag to me.
My messaging works just fine. I recently messaged the moderator for the Prepper’s Ping List and it was received.
I prove what I say with facts, with links to articles, to quotes from Walker. If my posting is somehow problematic, then I guess the only kind of exchange of ideas and volley of ideas back and forth that would satisfy you would be subjective beliefs about how great Walker is, right?
You have provided NOTHING of the above.
If you are going to post liberal headlines that are LIES after your read Walker's words, then you are not as smart as you think you are.
Please post Walker quotes that show his support for liberalism.
I’m sorry Erik, I can’t save you from making a bad choice. I really am. :(
In other words, you do not have any quotes or actions that Walker took that were liberal in nature. You have no substance to back up your claims.
It is fine that you support Cruz (I like him also) but it does not explain your need to tear down Walker.
If that is the life you lead, then you are a sad, pathetic human.
When Walker refused to defend traditional marriage in Wisconsin, why would conservative Freepers defend him?
Is not support for the ethanol mandate a liberal issue?
Is it not a known fact that these subsidies increase illegal invaders into America?
Is not supporting the ethanol mandate a commitment to an open-border?
When Walker refuses to immediately stop the Corn-Welfare-Queens, will there not be someone's child, mother, wife assaulted, raped, or killed by an illegal invader?
Have you no shame, Erik, for trying to defend the indefensible?
You are insane.
Walker did not spend state resources to fight gay marriage is not supporting gay marriage....it is knowing when you have lost the battle.
Walker does not support the ethanol mandate. This was pointed out to you, but you refuse to read Walker’s words and instead, spout the liberal spin that is meant to divide Walker’s support.
Walker does not support open borders. Period. Never has.
You are either believing liberal sources that fear Walker or you are a troll meant to undermine support for Walker.
Either way, you are my enemy and I will not trust anything you say or post.
Check his sign up date.
OH, I saw that a long time ago. Liberals know that we can be divided easily. SoConPubbie and 2ndDivisionVet are two longtime FReepers who disappoint me in their thoughtless attacks on Walker....which are just regurgitating liberal stories meant to divide the conservative wing of the GOP.
Others love Cruz and will try to destroy anyone else. That is childish.
But, this guy is nothing more than a troll. He has had no substance to anything he posts.
I have done so, now it is your turn to convince Tea Party Conservaties that Walker will not backstab them if he becomes President.
If you refuse to do so, it will be an admittance that your agenda is one of moderation, aka RINOISM.
(And somehow I fully expect you will conveniently ignore the damning statements he has made that show his capitulation to the Chamber of Amnesty and other liberal groups, in order to attract their votes.)
BTW, I will not consider you my enemy because I think you have yet to be educated about Walker's true nature, and I suspect if you just sat down and thought about what he says versus what he does, you would be in agreement that Walker cannot be trusted, based on his RECORD of surrendering to liberal issues as a result of pandering to liberal, special-interest groups.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.