To: demshateGod
I think the difference between the 9mm and the .40 is that though the .40 has better knockdown power, it is slower to get back on target.
I carry a Glock 26 (9mm) so I am prejudiced. BTW, I load it with a 15 round mag when at home.
6 posted on
02/28/2015 6:05:43 AM PST by
RoosterRedux
(WSC: The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end...)
To: RoosterRedux
Bullets don’t have knock down power.
7 posted on
02/28/2015 6:11:58 AM PST by
Ajnin
(Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinion of sheep.)
To: RoosterRedux
That’s a good argument in favor of 9 and .45. .40 has a very violent recoil.
8 posted on
02/28/2015 6:13:11 AM PST by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: RoosterRedux
I have a 26, too. Along with a 17, 19 and a 21. The 26 is too damn small of a hand print for me. Only way I can use it is with the sissy-finger mag extension bottom plates.
They’re all good, I think, but to me they are dangerous and not in the good sense. I much prefer the 1911s I have.
12 posted on
02/28/2015 6:19:26 AM PST by
Gaffer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson