Posted on 02/26/2015 11:07:16 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
be careful not to get your d^^^ caught in your grille
There might be something to this. I’m sure my senior wife would appreciate a 17 year old Thai girl around the house to help out.
So a tv show tells us how people are in reality?
Really?
That should end things right there.
“Polygamy seems to be one of those rare issues that liberals and conservatives agree on — they both disapprove, but for different reasons.”
Liberals are against it until they are for it.
You mean the kicker?
“Bigamy is one wife too many, Monogomany is the same thing.”
-Oscar Wilde
What is so obscure about "no man can serve two masters"
What is the legal difference between pretending that same sex "marriage" is real and pretending that a marriage between a man and a grapefruit is real? As far as I'm concerned, if the man consents and the citrus raises no objection, it's just as real as a game of make-believe pretending to have a connection to the most important institution in western culture.
“But the question of whether polygamy should be illegal in the United States is its own issue, and ought to be considered on its merits.”
Homo marriage, polygamy, and various other attempts to fabricate alternatives to one man/one woman have no merit, nor do those who find those acceptable. The liberaltarian claptrap ignores that one of the purposes of government is to preserve civilization, not barbarism.
Funny! I’m in the ‘no go’ zone! :-P
Great point!
A guy comes home drunk carrying a sheep under his arm.
He fumbles with the lock, stumbles in and slams the door.
He loudly climbs the stairs, waking his wife and turns on the bedroom light.
“Honey,” he slurs, “this is the cow I sleep with when you’re not in the mood.”
“You stupid drunk,” she answers angrily, “that’s not a cow! That’s a sheep!”
“S’cuse me...” he replies, “I was talking to the sheep.”
Does what? The Russian experiment of the late 1930s and early 1940s revealed the damage caused to society and individuals by the government’s attempts to destroy the marriage and family institution. Even though it went contrary to the Communist ideology, the Soviet Union felt it had not other option except to start supporting the traditional marriage and nuclear family.
Forbidding it? I”m not in the legislature. I have no more power over polygamy than I do over gay marriage. Or do you think I”m here preparing the ground for group marriage, polygamy and 70s style swinging? Lol
Post 14 was a simple enough post, there was nothing in there that implied that you need to explain that you aren’t an elected official and in the legislature, or about any powers you might have.
Your post was totally evasive in responding to the simple observation in post 14.
Here it is in it’s entirety. “Your early posts on the topic and your persistence in posting on it, indicate that polygamy is not something that you strongly oppose.
Am I correct in thinking that forbidding polygamy is not a major goal to you?”
Why should it be something I’m for or against forbidding? Polygamy, insofar as I know, is already illegal within the United States, or did you hear something while I was out today? And since “gay marriage” is now the law of the land, how will anyone stop polygamy or relative marriage? On what basis? Welcome to Obamaland.
It isn’t a slippery slope because homosexuals are further down the slope than polygamists IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.