The emerging Iran nuclear deal raises major concerns

Washington Post ^ | 2-8-15 | Editorial Board

[okie01]

The problems raised by authorities ranging from Henry Kissinger, the country’s most senior former secretary of state, to Sen. Timothy M. Kaine, Virginia’s junior senator, can be summed up in three points:

●First, a process that began with the goal of eliminating Iran’s potential to produce nuclear weapons has evolved into a plan to tolerate and temporarily restrict that capability.

Iran is going to get the bomb. We were lied to.

●Second, in the course of the negotiations, the Obama administration has declined to counter increasingly aggressive efforts by Iran to extend its influence across the Middle East and seems ready to concede Tehran a place as a regional power at the expense of Israel and other U.S. allies.

Obama is going to sell-out Israel. We were lied to.

●Finally, the Obama administration is signaling that it will seek to implement any deal it strikes with Iran — including the suspension of sanctions that were originally imposed by Congress — without a vote by either chamber. Instead, an accord that would have far-reaching implications for nuclear proliferation and U.S. national security would be imposed unilaterally by a president with less than two years left in his term.

Obama doesn't give a crap about U.S. national security nor the constitution. We were lied to.
***********************************************************<
And only now are they awakening to the impending disaster that they themselves helped to create.

Liberals destroy everything they touch.

[FreedomStar3028]

Oh really? It’s about to be. We are on the precipice. At anytime the left could seize whatever they want, and no one will lift a finger. It’s way past the red line.