Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill would set up run-off elections after inconclusive party primary result
Radio Iowa ^ | O. Kay Henderson

Posted on 02/05/2015 3:06:22 PM PST by ObamahatesPACoal

A bill that would set up run-off elections in Iowa when none of the candidates in a party’s primary election get 35 percent of the vote has cleared its first hurdle at the statehouse.

Under current Iowa law, a political party holds a special nominating convention if none of its candidates reaches that 35 percent threashold in a primary election. Senator Jeff Danielson, a Democrat from Cedar Falls, says letting “party insiders” make the pick leads to questions about the “legitimacy” of the chosen candidate.

“I believe this bill is necessary because I would like Iowa’s election processes from beginning to end to have the greatest participation of the people,” Danielson says.

(SNIP)

Danielson notes two of Iowa’s four congressmen were the products of special nominating conventions, as both Congressman David Young and Congressman Steve King became their party’s pick for the job after inconclusive primary election results.

(Excerpt) Read more at radioiowa.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: caucus; convention; primary; runoff
Steve King got the most votes at 31% in 2002. But David Young was fifth and then once nominated revealed he supports amnesty and obamacare.
1 posted on 02/05/2015 3:06:22 PM PST by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

Why 35%? Shouldn’t it be 50%?


2 posted on 02/05/2015 3:11:42 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Iowa law says you must get 35% of the vote in order to advance in the Primary. The 35% number is because there is no limit to the number of people who can have their name on the ballot.


3 posted on 02/05/2015 5:08:14 PM PST by Iowa Granny (Clintion ruined a dress, but Obama ruined a Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

RE: 35%
I don’t understand how the proposed language solves the problem.

If 3 people run in the primary and each gets 33% of the vote...now, what?
If 4 people run in the primary and each gets 25% of the vote...now, what?
etc.
Why don’t they just say that the top 2 vote-getters proceed to a run-off?


4 posted on 02/05/2015 5:19:00 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy, and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
If this bill as currently written becomes law, however, the top two finishers in a primary would face one another in a run-off election held four weeks after the primary. This would apply to primaries for statewide and federal office in Iowa as well as county elections.

Under current Iowa law, if nobody gets 35% in the primary, a nominating convention picks the candidate. Rep. David Young, Iowa CD-3, finished fifth in the June 2014 primary but was nominated at the convention.

5 posted on 02/05/2015 5:45:43 PM PST by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

There’s no limit to the number of candidates who can be on the ballot in Texas too, but if no candidate gets at least a majority vote (50% +1), there is automatically a runoff. Under Iowa rules, David Dewhurst would be the junior US Senator from Texas instead of Ted Cruz.


6 posted on 02/05/2015 7:30:31 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson