Posted on 02/01/2015 9:50:49 AM PST by Kaslin
OK, I need to check grammar before I post a little more often...
Speaking of the people who forced this mandate on us, federal government fleet vehicles are subject to very rigid policies requiring use of alternative / renewable fuels. Except for when the nearest E85 or Biodiesel pump is fifteen or more miles away - in which case the Dept. Of Energy issues a waiver. Nice, huh?
He’s a good guy. The smaller actually benefitted during his “new investment” as he was out of their market.
I was at a meeting where Senator John Thune (R-SD) was speaking...Thune is a big ethanol advocate. One of the audience asked Sen. Thune why if corn ethanol is such a good thing, no farm machinery runs on E-85. You would think that farmers would demand farm machinery run on ethanol, yet none does. Sen Thune had no answer to this question. Corn ethanol is a boondoggle and is nothing but a big farm subsidy program. It would be cheaper if the government just wrote corn farmers a check every year.
At the Fort Campbell, KY Blanchfield Army Community Hospital (BACH) there a 5 or six handicapped parking spaces for vehicles specifically for flex fuel cars. Other cars who use regular gas and have handicapped license plates or cards that they hang on they mirror do too. The parking spaces are close to the Outpatient entrance of the Hospital. They have other handicapped parking spaces but they are farther away and if you have to use a cane like I have to it’s very hard
Don’t forget the other way ethanol subsidizes ag: Cheap high-protein animal feed. Production of pork, chicken and eggs is much cheaper than it would be without corn ethanol.
I can’t blame the farmers not wanting to use it. You get less gas mileage out of it than with just 10% Ethanol
you have to start somewhere, to fight OPEC.
of course, supporters of Exxon will disagree.
reducing demand for (pure-hydrocarbon)gasoline by
a few percent can make a big difference.
a better idea would be for the rest of the world
to go to E5 or E10.
The government subsidizes ethanol production. I do not know this for a fact, but I would not doubt your federal gas tax is doing the subsidizing. My guess is that you (we) paid for it up front.
Gasohol is another wealth redistribution scheme. Cost more money and pass it around. The Gruberment is always against free market capitalism common sense that should have been obvious to them long before this cat got loose.
Actually, JMHO, it's all about the Iowa Caucus.
Move the Iowa Caucus (how could you, but just follow the argument), and watch the RFS garbage wither and die. Of course, it's a big crony-capitalist conspiracy (CCC) now, so it has a life of its own and is an Iron Triangle of interlocking interests. None of them ours, unfortunately.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.