Posted on 01/13/2015 7:50:40 PM PST by Nachum
Last week the Obama White House refused to call the slaughter at Charlie Hebdo newspaper an act of terrorism. The Obama administration was waiting for an investigation.
Today White House Spokesman Josh Earnest said it was inaccurate to use the phrase radical Islam.
Im describing a reason why we have not chosen to use that label because it doesnt seem to accurately describe what had happened.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Won’t president Cruz be such a breathe of fresh air? Even more than Reagan after Carter.
This jackass has his head where the sun don’t shine. Typical of communists Democrats.
At this point, President Eastwood would be acceptable.
What a slimy little weasel. Actually, “radical Islam” is redundant - Islam itself is radical by its very nature. It is at war with all human civilization. It must be terminated.
Well then obviously the Black House can site other examples where cartoonists were massacred because everyday people were upset with their cartoons.
Hey Josh!
What about Ft. Hood, 9/11, Oklahoma (recent meat processing plant), the underwear bomber, the shoe bomber, the London subway, (you guys add the other 10 I’ve missed here)????
Each of the Perps was happy to proclaim their Islamic motivation.
Why can’t YOU and Obama recognize that?
When you basically support the Islamists, it’s hard to condem their necessary actions. If you jail a film maker for “causing” murder in Bengazi, you can only applaud the purification of speech in France.
No, Josh, your damned name is inaccurate.
You are a disgusting and shameless liar.
You are a disgrace to this country.
he also denied that allah is one of many Babylonian gods
People who are in government positions who say absurd things like this usually end up writing a “tell all” book or article to cash in and make a few bucks on the lecture circuit. Otherwise this man is delusional or seriously demented.
Keep digging a$$ hole (Earnest).
Well idiot, I doubt it was “radical Amish” that did it!
Not trying to be critical, but I've noticed you always use the plural form of the word, 'Communist', in your posts. Is there some reason you never use the singular form, even where appropriate?
Just curious.
Is it 2017 yet?
Even France knows the attacks was radical Islam. The whole world understands it. Maybe it’s because we have a radical former muslim (now secular marxist) in the WH.
Just remember Josh’s job us to speak for the president
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.