Skip to comments.
Federal judge upholds Obama’s executive amnesty over challenge from Joe Arpaio
Hotair ^
| 12/26/2014
| AllahPundit
Posted on 12/26/2014 11:50:52 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Bryn Mawr and Columbia..... Why don't they just collapse that to "hothouse mandarin" and give her lifters and a sedan chair so people will know to get out of her way wherever she goes?
Privilege-Academy stuffed shirt.
21
posted on
12/26/2014 3:44:45 PM PST
by
lentulusgracchus
("If America was a house, the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutfeld)
To: SeekAndFind
22
posted on
12/26/2014 3:45:34 PM PST
by
Ray76
(Who gave the stand down order in Ferguson? Who gave the stand down order in Benghazi?)
To: SeekAndFind
“... is it time yet, Claire?”
23
posted on
12/26/2014 3:48:07 PM PST
by
Gritty
(Evidence suggests once you reach the post-Christian stage, you don't have much of a future-Mk Steyn)
To: LucyT
Necessary step to get it to the SCOTUS
24
posted on
12/26/2014 3:57:43 PM PST
by
hoosiermama
(Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
25
posted on
12/26/2014 4:22:08 PM PST
by
Ann Archy
(ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Savage Beast
“The U.S. Judiciary is part of the Praetorian Guard.”
Yep.
26
posted on
12/26/2014 4:42:38 PM PST
by
Luke21
To: mrsmith
"The judge is right however. Obamas actions can be stopped by simply authorizing enough funds for removal- which the GOPe refuse to do!" As John Roberts proved with his ObamaCare "tax" opinion, the courts will not save our cause when there are legislative remedies available.>P>
27
posted on
12/26/2014 5:15:21 PM PST
by
buckalfa
(Too many evenings spent at the North Heidelberg back in 1968)
To: SeekAndFind
Simply by looking at the language used by the judge in the ruling shows a basic lack of understanding of law or a lapse of ethics; either of which should result in removal of the judge. Note the U.S. Code, the base reference point of law, uses the words “illegal alien” to define a class of people. There is no “undocumented immigrant” class of people known to the U.S. Code. All immigrants have documents, because they did not break the law. The ruling should be treated as a nullity on the grounds the court has no jurisdiction to consider fictional “undocumented immigrants”.
To: All
Mmmmm........Arpaio suing for the reason stated seems a bit simplistic.
Arpaio should let the rubber hit the road.
(1) He should sue the malpractice insurance companies of any lawyer representing illegals and/or advising them on ways to contravene US law.
(2) Mobilizing the Bank Secrecy act should also be considered-----to determine who exactly is aiding and abetting crimes against the state by funding these felons.
(3) Lawyers who attempt to bring to court clients "w/ unclean hands" (a legal term meaning those who committed crimes) should be reported to the state's Bar Association....and considered for disbarment.
29
posted on
12/27/2014 5:40:57 AM PST
by
Liz
(Pres Reagan on govt shutdown: "Let's close it down and see if anyone notices.")
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Of course the rule of law doesn’t apply: the people breaking it are black/brown.
Now shut your bigoted face and go pay your taxes. The lawbreakers that hate you need the money. :)
30
posted on
12/27/2014 9:59:51 AM PST
by
Tzimisce
To: SeekAndFind
Is this another case? I recall this happening days ago.
31
posted on
12/27/2014 1:55:50 PM PST
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: SeekAndFind
“and the president cannot refuse to expend funds appropriated by Congress,”
Huh? Where’d she get that idea?
32
posted on
12/28/2014 5:25:56 PM PST
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Repeal The 17th
Unless also prohibited by a mirroring state law, is there anything in federal law that requires the states to enforce those laws?No.
Could state and local jurisdictions simply refuse to enforce them?
Yes, and many already do.
To: SeekAndFind
Considering it was reported that 90% of the ‘undocumented’ didn't show for their first appointment with INS, this judge is FOS. You can't defer on a case by case basis when the ‘case’ has moved into the shadows.
34
posted on
12/30/2014 3:55:45 PM PST
by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson