Posted on 12/24/2014 6:53:05 AM PST by rktman
White House Science Adviser John Holdren says the global goal is to have world-wide carbon dioxide emissions close to zero by 2100. He admitted, "That will not be easy."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
Him first...
Buttwipes in the White Hut wants snowball earth. Jack-wagons!
It’s seems easy for those who are so concerned to just sacrifice themselves to save Gaia. Problem solved.
Doesn't this dimwit know that everything you do makes CO2.
You would have to kill everything on the planet to make CO2 close to zero.
Someone should really make a rule against the inmates running the asylum
They can start by turning off those CO2-producing engines on Air Force One while over the ocean one night.
No...it won't be easy. It will be impossible. Is this mind-numbingly moronic idiot planning on turning off or draining the oceans? They alone are responsible for releasing more CO2 than all man's actions have emitted.
The EXEMPT will not be first.
They will kill the non-EXEMPT by ObamaCARE (no medicine)
and the diseases they are importing DAILY and covering
up (eg. Ebola).
It is rather baffling that these supposed brilliant folks don’t seem to understand that warmer is better then a whole new sheet of ice 1000 feet thick advancing. THEN you got a problem. Simply ask them to do the following:
1. Define the correct temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the correct humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the correct mean sea level for the planet
4. Define the correct amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the correct makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the correct amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
Okay, everybody! go breathe on Obozero...........
WH Science adviser hates plants, wants to choke them out by 2100 by cutting their CO2 intake.
Then there is beer and all distilled spirits. It seems to me they are going to outlaw beer, beer that is a positive CO2 emitter, every glass and pitcher
Been waiting for an opportunity to post this classic.
Proof that everyone in the Obama tribe is nuts and need a rubber room ASAP.
It is entirely theoretically possible to eliminate net CO2 emissions. Just stop using fossil fuels.
Now doing this abruptly would probably result in the deaths of a large perecentage of the world’s population. Half or more. The survivors would continue on at a much lower economic level.
However, there are at least two technologies that at least in theory would allow us to continue developing economically while abandoning fossil fuels: space-based solar power and enormously expanded nuclear energy usage.
Either of these could within a few decades provide adequate energy without using fossil fuels.
Not proposing any of this or claiming that it’s either economically feasible or desirable for other reasons. Only that fossil fuels are NOT in theory the only way to power a modern economy into the future.
Simple solution:
STOP BREATHING.
CO2 in oceans comes and goes. It doesn’t add to the total CO2 in the ecosystem. Burning fossil fuels does.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.