Posted on 12/15/2014 6:05:48 AM PST by rktman
Freedom is our birthright. The forthcoming climate treaty if the failed Copenhagen draft of five years ago is any guide may yet prove a greater threat to liberty than fascism or communism. For it is the same threat writ global, albeit with the jackboots and guns very carefully hidden for now.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
1. Define the correct temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the correct humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the correct mean sea level for the planet
4. Define the correct amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the correct makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the correct amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
That should all be easy enough to do.
Correct is whatever they determine it to be minute to minute. The details of reality are not important, only their need to control. They must have every jot and tittle of moral authority removed from their patina revealing the harsh ugliness of their enterprise.
Facts are stubborn things. That is why we no longer need them.
The man with gun to your head doesn’t have to define anything.
8. Describe, in detail, the technologies available to mankind to control 1-6.
9. Describe, in detail, the interactions of all the atmospheric, terrestrial, geologic, and biological systems that contribute to 1-6. Include your plan for getting through the transient period from today to your ideal 1-6.
10. Describe, in detail, contingency plans, what could go wrong and how to mitigate them if we were so foolish as to try.
11. Justify how this attempt to "manage" nature will be different than any of mankind's other initial attempts to "manage" nature - which haven't worked out so well.
12. List the species of flora and fauna that will be stressed/lost by transitioning to the idea 1-6.
13. Explain how holding climate in an artificial stasis would be a good thing when nature seems to abhor stagnation.
We’d just get the old mom and pop answer. “Because we said so, that’s what.”
Any Climate Treaty will be reinterpreted, twisted, manipulated and expanded just like the federal government under Obama has manipulated and expanded the Patriot Act and just like the Supreme Court has manipulated the US Constitution.
I would add one more:
Will ALL countries be held to the same standard/restrictions?
Globull is a crock of crap!
“Will ALL countries be held to the same standard/restrictions?” LOL! That’s just silly of course. Only industrialized nations that have done so much to destroy the world will be held accountable. The rest of you, back in your mud huts and burn some more cattle poop to cook your meager dinner. Never mind that the industrialized countries have been sending you a lot of your food. Well at least the elites have been getting it. Their distended stomachs ain’t from hunger.
You have done what the MSM never do with regard to “climate change”: ask just how we determine what those optimal readings are for such things as sea ice coverage, average temperature, etc. The topic is loaded with unexamined and unchallenged assumptions. It is the champions of “climate change” who act is if they can PREVENT the climate from changing, as if they can stop it at some ideal point the way you would adjust the thermostat in your house.
I put them together for us:
Hand out the following to anyone:
1. Define the correct temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the correct humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the correct mean sea level for the planet
4. Define the correct amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the correct makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the correct amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
8. Describe, in detail, the technologies available to mankind to control 1-6.
9. Describe, in detail, the interactions of all the atmospheric, terrestrial, geologic, and biological systems that contribute to 1-6. Include your plan for getting through the transient period from today to your ideal 1-6.
10. Describe, in detail, contingency plans, what could go wrong and how to mitigate them if we were so foolish as to try.
11. Justify how this attempt to “manage” nature will be different than any of mankind’s other initial attempts to “manage” nature - which haven’t worked out so well.
12. List the species of flora and fauna that will be stressed/lost by transitioning to the idea 1-6.
13. Explain how holding climate in an artificial stasis would be a good thing when nature seems to abhor stagnation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.