Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fail Mary: Senate rejects Keystone bill (She's Toast)
Politico ^ | Updated 11/19/14 12:23 AM EST | Elana Schor

Posted on 11/19/2014 5:05:20 AM PST by sr4402

The 59-41 Senate vote was just shy of the 60 votes needed to pass the bill, following a dramatic six days of whipping by the embattled Louisiana Democrat on an issue that almost all of Washington had expected to sit idle until next year.

The defeat deals a blow to Landrieu’s campaign ahead of her Dec. 6 runoff against GOP Rep. Bill Cassidy, whom polls show running comfortably ahead.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: billcassidy; energy; keystonexl; landrieu; louisiana; marylandrieu; opec; override; pipeline; robmaness; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
IMHO: Radical Progressive Environmentalism will cost power in the Senate and may bring the Democratic Party down.

With Landrieu's very probable defeat, power shifts to in the Senate away from the RINOs. Obama is going to have a much harder time getting anything past the Senate. Why did they do it?

The American people are crying out for Jobs and the Democrats clearly are clearly exposed as job opposers. And the Unions will be ticked because many of these would have been union jobs. Why are they doing this?

1 posted on 11/19/2014 5:05:20 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sr4402

The fix was in - Reid stacked the vote so that Landrieu would lose.


2 posted on 11/19/2014 5:08:21 AM PST by Old Sarge (TINVOWOOT: There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

The inimitable hairy just flexing his puny muscles to let everybody know he’s still in charge for a little while longer. As far as all the euphoria over the gop-e “wave”, you gotta consider that the next elections in ‘16 there’s a lot of “R” seats up for grabs. That gives the dhimmiokkkrats a lot of time to crank up the rhetoric and money printing presses. Be vigilant my friends.


3 posted on 11/19/2014 5:13:29 AM PST by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect "their" rights so they can now try to infringe on mine. Weird huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
The vote was going to lose, they just wanted to show Landrieu as solidly pro Keystone Pipeline. It was a political dog and pony show from the get go, otherwise it never would have seen the light of day. Funny how Jay Rockefeller was so anti-pipeline, seeing as how wealthy his family got on such things.
4 posted on 11/19/2014 5:18:13 AM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
The fix was in - Reid stacked the vote so that Landrieu would lose.

Just checked, Reid voted against her. He was the deciding vote.

Roll Call

Dingy Harry screws his own party.

5 posted on 11/19/2014 5:20:32 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sr4402; All
Dingy Harry personally screwed Landrieu:

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=2&vote=00280

6 posted on 11/19/2014 5:23:57 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

Wow..they pulled her funding then let her twist in the wind by one vote.


7 posted on 11/19/2014 5:26:27 AM PST by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

If Landrieu honestly believed that passing the Keystone bill would saver her sorry ass for being defeated in the runoff then she’s delusional.


8 posted on 11/19/2014 5:29:38 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

If so, Dingy Harry had best watch his back - I suspect Moon Landrieu is better connected, if he isn’t dead yet.


9 posted on 11/19/2014 5:34:56 AM PST by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

So let me ask the Freeper community to read the tea leaves.
Does this mean that there will be enough votes with the new Congress?


10 posted on 11/19/2014 5:35:46 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I wonder what the record is for McCain and Collins to caucus with the Left? That will be a start point...


11 posted on 11/19/2014 5:41:31 AM PST by Old Sarge (TINVOWOOT: There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

Now she’s worse off = Cassidy can now point to this failure as evidence of Mary’s total lack of influence in the Senate.


12 posted on 11/19/2014 5:43:10 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

Now she’s worse off = Cassidy can now point to this failure as evidence of Mary’s total lack of influence in the Senate.


13 posted on 11/19/2014 5:43:10 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

DemocRAT buddies give Landrieu a good rogering as a going away gift.


14 posted on 11/19/2014 5:43:19 AM PST by Iron Munro (DHS has the same headcount as the US Marine Corps with twice the budget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

Obama threatened to veto it anyway, so even if it passed, it was an effort in futility — except that it got Dems on the record as voting for or against.

When the issue resurfaces early next year, the Pubbie majority plus some Dems might have enough to override an Obama veto.


15 posted on 11/19/2014 5:45:46 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol; All
There were 13 Democrats voting for the Pipeline including Begich who just lost. Therefore if these Democrat Senators vote the same way this would mean 54+13= 67.

Roll Call Could someone look up the House tally and come up with that side?

16 posted on 11/19/2014 5:48:29 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol; All
(Correction) There were 13 Democrats voting for the Pipeline including Begich who just lost. Therefore if these Democrat Senators vote the same way this would mean 54+12= 66.

Roll Call Could someone look up the House tally and come up with that side?

17 posted on 11/19/2014 5:49:56 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

DNC pulled ad money.

Senate couldn’t get 60 votes for her.

Obama threatened to veto the bill anyway.

==

It has been a rough several days for the Soon-to-be-former Senator.

She can email other formers — Pryor and Lincoln — to get some advice on how to handle forced retirement.

[There are rumors that she will run to the seat currently held by Vitter, as he will be running for Governor.]


18 posted on 11/19/2014 5:50:58 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

Its time for Mary to unleash on the Senate Dems. At this point, even she knows she’s going to lose so why not start unloading on them in speeches on the Senate floor? I guess she won’t because it would jeopardize that high-paying lobbyist job she’s probably angling for at this point.


19 posted on 11/19/2014 5:51:54 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Enough for cloture. Not enough to override a veto.

It is astonishing to see how many MSM stories manage to avoid the f-word. They say that the Senate "defeated" the pipeline, when the Senate voted 59-41 in favor. The Senate failed to break a filibuster, but reporting that accurately would hang the obstructionist tag around Reid, and the MSM won't do that.

20 posted on 11/19/2014 5:56:14 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson