Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge who sat on Planned Parenthood’s board to determine whether Planned Parenthood will remain open
LifeSiteNews ^ | 11/12/14 | Ben Johnson

Posted on 11/13/2014 7:26:47 AM PST by wagglebee

Pro-life leaders say a federal judge must recuse himself from hearing a legal challenge to a case that could make Cincinnati abortion-free, because he once served as president of the local Planned Parenthood chapter.

U.S. District Judge Timothy S. Black has been chosen to hear Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. Hodges – a lawsuit seeking to invalidate an Ohio law requiring abortionists to have admitting privileges at a local hospital within 30 miles of their office. The law, signed by Gov. John Kasich, also forbade public hospitals from providing admitting privileges to abortion providers.

Since most private hospitals in the area are Catholic and decline to offer such privileges to abortionists due to their faith, the Elizabeth Campbell Surgical Center is facing closure.

Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region sued Ohio on Monday, arguing that the law would make Cincinnati abortion-free.

But in a 2010 questionnaire filed with the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Black revealed that he was director of the Planned Parenthood Association of Cincinnati for three years (1986-1989) and its president in 1988.

“It is a conflict of interest for a former Planned Parenthood of Cincinnati director and president to judge a case involving the same organization he has ties with,” said Paula Westwood, executive director of Right to Life of Greater Cincinnati. “A judge is required who can make an objective decision according to the rule of law.”

Planned Parenthood is asking its former officer to declare the law unconstitutional, allowing Planned Parenthood to resume its relationship with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center and remain open for business. Otherwise, Cincinnati will become the largest metropolitan area in the United States without an abortion facility.

Judge Black has not yet stated whether he will hear the case.

In 2011, he allowed former Democratic Congressman Steve Driehaus to sue the Susan B. Anthony List for saying his vote for ObamaCare supported “taxpayer-funded abortion.” Black reversed himself in January 2013, tossing the lawsuit and saying that he “could not see the forest for the trees.”

Judge Black is no stranger to controversy since being named to the bench by President Obama in 2010. Last July, Black ordered the state of Ohio to recognize same-sex “marriages” contracted in other states, a decision that was overruled by a panel of judges from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.  


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; ohio; plannedparenthood; prolife
Planned Parenthood is asking its former officer to declare the law unconstitutional, allowing Planned Parenthood to resume its relationship with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center and remain open for business.

The left doesn't care about ethics, NOTHING is more important to them than protecting Big Murder.

1 posted on 11/13/2014 7:26:47 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus; narses; Salvation
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 11/13/2014 7:27:14 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 11/13/2014 7:27:44 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“The left doesn’t care about ethics.”

Besides abortion judges, out here in Californicator land we have green rat judges. These green rat judges have been leaders and board members of the Sierra Club and other anti America so called green organizations.

All of them refuse to recluse themselves when a so called environmental case comes to their courthouses.


4 posted on 11/13/2014 7:32:41 AM PST by Grampa Dave (The Democrats, who run America are too old, too rich, and too very/very white elitist losers!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

They’re getting too much bad press. They should change the name to one more optly suited anyway.

Like ‘The Final Solution’.


5 posted on 11/13/2014 7:35:37 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

“I’ve got judges on the payroll...”


6 posted on 11/13/2014 7:42:13 AM PST by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

bump!


7 posted on 11/13/2014 8:34:26 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The rare times when a democrat shows integrity are surprising. Because this addresses a core democrat value (killing innocent babies), this will not be one of those times.


8 posted on 11/13/2014 9:59:56 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region sued Ohio on Monday, arguing that the law would make Cincinnati abortion-free.

So what's the problem?

9 posted on 11/13/2014 12:03:31 PM PST by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

In “Ecoscience,” Holdren claimed that reproduction was not a human right.

“Some people—respected legislators, judges, and lawyers included—have viewed the right to have children as a fundamental and inalienable right,” he asserted. “Yet neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution mentions a right to reproduce.”

“Nor does the UN Charter describe such a right, although a resolution of the United Nations affirms the “right responsibly to choose” the number and spacing of children (our emphasis).”


10 posted on 11/14/2014 12:49:37 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson