Scott Walker: 'Big Loser' Hillary is 'Everything That's Wrong with Washington'

Breitbart ^ | 11-9-14 | Tony Lee

[afraidfortherepublic]

After winning re-election last Tuesday, Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said Hillary Clinton was a "big loser" in the midterms and embodies "everything that's wrong with Washington."

Walker, whose re-election has made him a top presidential contender, is not the first potential GOP 2016 candidate to attack potential opponent Clinton.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), another top presidential contender, immediately started a "Hillary's Losers" campaign on social media on Tuesday, highlighting all of the Democrats who lost after Clinton campaigned for them.

Walker also said on Meet The Press that voters are fed up with the Washington that Clinton embodies. He said that any of the 31 GOP governors would make better presidents than people from Washington. He said voters can find "bottom-up" solutions that are "fresh" and "organic" on the state level.

[afraidfortherepublic]

[afraidfortherepublic]

Meet the ‘Depressed’ ping.

FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.

[ScottinVA]

Among the top GOPers in the country, if there’s anyone more battle-tested than Walker, I’ve yet to see him or her. This guy’s absolutely fearless.

[Morpheus2009]

Here’s my question: does anyone think that irritating the labor Unions is a good characteristic for Scott Walker as a presidential contender? Either way, Hillary is an insider who’s interested in D.C. for the money. Plus electing her is re-electing Billy Jeff back into the White House, can’t do either of those.

[afraidfortherepublic]

See #3!

[samtheman]

Its still very early but to me its between Walker and Cruz and though Cruz is very good, its hard to argue against nominating a governor who has Walker’s creds.

[afraidfortherepublic]

As you say, it’s early. However, Wiscconsin really needs Scott Walker to work his magic in Madison for 4 more years.

[samtheman]

Good point.

[yldstrk]

‘Iritating” the unions? Please. The unions are dead weight and need to be pruned way back.

[afraidfortherepublic]

I have a barn full of his 4 x 8 and 4 x 4 signs and posts and notice that they all say “I (or we) Stand with Scott Walker”. They are poised and ready for the next election, recall, whatever! We don’t have to spend money twice for the same thing. LOL.

[samtheman]

You are lucky to have him. I live in NJ.

[afraidfortherepublic]

[Paine in the Neck]

[JohnBrowdie]

regardless of the nominee, do you think that big labor is going to love us?

[hinckley buzzard]

Get real. "Irritating the labor unions" is an unavoidable side effect of doing the right thing. It didn't keep Walker from winning three elections in four years and governing well.

[cdcdawg]

Sounds like Walker is in!

[Dr. Sivana]

if there’s anyone more battle-tested than Walker, I’ve yet to see him or her. This guy’s absolutely fearless.

And squeaky clean. They have NOTHING on him.

[Dr. Sivana]

As you say, it’s early. However, Wisconsin really needs Scott Walker to work his magic in Madison for 4 more years.

They get two more years, his understudy is a good woman, and if he became the Republican nominee, the loons in Madison will provide so many hilarious over the top quotables that the Dem nominee will not get any traction.

If Walker WINS the presidency, I pretty much expect Madison itself to look like the aftermath of a neutron bomb, with a few left wailing and grinding their teeth and rending their pink dresses on their segways.

[jersey117]

When it comes to Hillary and her accomplishments, the rats and the media are good at pretending what is, isn’t.

[edpc]

F them. Walker and Kasich both won 2 terms in union heavy states. Both turned their states around in difficult circumstances. Walker even withstood the kitchen sink union effort for recall. Either would make good candidates in 2016, should they choose to run.