And that's supposed to be reassuring?
Remind me, wasn't this guy appointed by a Republican President? 
Posted on 11/04/2014 2:26:37 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Three federal appeals court judges struggled Tuesday over whether the National Security Agency's phone data surveillance program is an intelligence-gathering tool that makes the nation safer or an intrusive threat that endangers privacy.
The judges — all appointed by Republican presidents — expressed uncertainty about where to draw the line between legal surveillance and violations of constitutional rights in the age of terrorism.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...
And that's supposed to be reassuring?
Remind me, wasn't this guy appointed by a Republican President?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.