Posted on 11/01/2014 1:02:52 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
President Obama Elected with Illegal Votes?
European leftists prefer American presidents who are critics of capitalism and fans of redistribution. The same is typically true of others foreigners, according to various surveys that show a Democrat candidate could win in presidential contests where foreigners had a voice at the ballot box. Polls like that are hypothetical, of course, because it is illegal for foreign nationals to vote in federal elections. But a new academic study shows foreign nationals have been in a position to help Democrats steal elections. In fact, the study demonstrates that is likely that President Obama won the presidency thanks to non-citizens illegally voting for him in 2008. On top of that stunning conclusion, the study also concludes that “non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.”
If this study’s results are accurate, the implications are startling: Obama is president as the result of election fraud. We have Obamacare because of election fraud. We have Dodd-Frank because of election fraud. We have Solyndra because of election fraud.
Without the election fraud that put Obama in office, there’d be no lawless amnesty for illegal aliens, no Operation Fast and Furious, no Obama IRS assault on Americans.
Don’t take my word for it, you can draw your own conclusion from the alarming assessment that comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), which is operated by teams of researchers from across the country. Non-citizens are inclined to support Democrat candidates – and President Obama – pulled in more than 80 percent of the vote from non-citizens in 2008, according to CCES. There were enough ineligible voters to cast ballots in the 2008 election cycle to pull out Democratic victories in close elections nationwide.
The results of the CCES study show how serious this problem has become. The non-citizen vote was large enough to account for Democrat victories in a few close elections, according to a Washington Post article written by two of the political science professors who authored the study. It is possible that non-citizens were a significant factor in Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina. How do they know? This conclusion is based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote that show 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010. They may not sound like big numbers, but they are big enough to make a difference in tight, competitive races.
And there is little doubt that these votes helped put Obama into the presidency. The study notes “it is likely though by no means certain that John McCain would have won North Carolina were it not for the votes for Obama cast by non-citizens.” North Carolina’s Electoral College votes were the difference between Obama’s winning and losing the presidency.
Judicial Watch has long maintained, and this study confirms, left-wing opposition to voter ID laws makes perverse sense. The Democratic candidates mostly favored by the left are the biggest beneficiaries of voter fraud. In this coming Tuesday’s mid-term elections, American citizens may have another election stolen from them – again – in North Carolina. In North Carolina officials have found at least 145 illegal aliens who are still in the country as a result of Obama’s lawless amnesty and are registered to vote. North Carolina has one of the closest U.S. Senate races in the entire country, John Fund, a columnist for National Review explains. The non-citizen vote in North Carolina alone could help determine which party controls the U.S. Senate.
This is not a partisan issue, one can imagine many a Republican, desperate to obtain or retain federal office, happy to look the other way if illegal votes from non-citizens can help win an election.
This is a major story and confirms JW’s working theory that foreign nationals illegally vote in federal elections in large numbers and have assisted Democrats, including this president, to steal elections.
This is why the Left, led by this Obama administration, does not want voter ID, loves same-day registration, by-mail voting, etc. and craves amnesty (by hook or by Obama crook) and open borders. It is not about the Hispanic vote – it is about the illegal alien vote (and the legal alien vote), it is about stealing elections.
Fellow American, you simply cannot take for granted that your vote counts. This new study confirms that there is a real chance your vote can be cancelled out by an illegal vote cast by legal or illegal aliens.
Judicial Watch does not take our basic freedoms for granted, and we are acting to protect the lawful votes of United States citizens. Judicial Watch has been working hard for a long time to protect our nation’s elections from fraud. Through our Election Integrity Project, Judicial Watch has taken the lead in fighting voter fraud and protecting the integrity of the ballot box nationwide. Judicial Watch’s examination of data published in 2013 capturing 2012 voter rolls and population data showed that at least 11 states plus D.C. had substantially out-of-date voter rolls, with multiple counties where the number of registered voters exceeded the total voting age population. According to Pew Charitable Trusts Report published in 2012, “24 million — one of every eight — active voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or are significantly inaccurate.”
The problem is big, but we are winning. In 2014, we successfully resolved lawsuits in Ohio and Indiana related to cleaning voter rolls in order to comply with the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Judicial Watch has threatened NVRA lawsuits in Colorado, Iowa, and the District of Columbia. Judicial Watch has ongoing NVRA investigations in Alabama, California, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, and West Virginia. Voters in all these states should be aware their voting rolls are dirty and susceptible to fraud.
Judicial Watch is also defending voter ID and other election integrity laws in the courts through amicus briefs or other participation in cases in North Carolina, Arkansas, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Kansas, and Arizona.
We’ve been particularly effective in North Carolina, calling out the Obama administration on its canard that election integrity suppresses the minority votes and highlighting how the hypocritical race hustlers in the Justice Department are actually belittling black American voters with your tax dollars.
Non-citizen voting is swaying our elections. Voter ID, as the Old Dominion University study concludes, can minimize but won’t eliminate this lawlessness. Proof of citizenship requirements, clean lists, diligence by election officials and other election integrity reforms are also part of the reform solution.
That is why, when the Obama Justice Department opposes voter ID and other basic election integrity measures in North Carolina, we are there to fight in court. And when it opposes proof of citizenship requirements, we are there. And when the compromised Obama gang wants to “fix” elections by actively opposing in court Judicial Watch’s successful effort to remove non-citizens from the rolls in Florida, we are there.
You can see “election integrity” is no academic debate. It is a day-to-day battle waged by our committed team at Judicial Watch. Our right to govern ourselves is under assault by an administration and a leftist movement that gains and keeps political power by negating your vote. Please support our cause as if the future of the country depended on it…because it does.
Judicial Watch: Watching the Polls in New Hampshire
You know that in close, competitive elections voter fraud can make the difference between the rule by law and rule by fraud. That’s why we are sending a team of lawyers and volunteer observers to New Hampshire on Election Day as part of our Election Integrity Project.
In the Granite State, citizens have a right to monitor elections so long as they do so unobtrusively. The Judicial Watch Election Integrity Protection program in New Hampshire will be lead and supervised by JW attorney Robert D. Popper. Popper is well-equipped to do so, as he is the former deputy chief of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Voting Rights Section. While serving in this capacity, Popper oversaw numerous DOJ election supervision efforts where DOJ attorneys and other staff members observed polling places. During our time in New Hampshire next week, our team of lawyers and volunteers will simply observe and document the election process – and won’t be making any voter challenges or engaging election officials.
Bob Popper explained our New Hampshire poll watching effort succinctly:
We will be there to silently observe and record whether state and federal election laws are faithfully followed. Judicial Watch is particularly interested in whether the requirements for voter ID are followed. We will also focus on whether those who want to both register and vote on Election Day are held to proof-of-identity requirements under New Hampshire law. Having supervised precisely these kinds of Election Day monitoring operations for the U.S. Department of Justice, I can say election monitoring deters fraud and reassures honest voters and election officials.
To put it plainly: the Left plans to sow confusion on Election Day. Unfortunately, the Obama Justice Department’s unhinged attacks on voter ID show that it cannot be trusted to ensure clean elections in November. So, in the key state of New Hampshire, once again this job falls to Judicial Watch. We are pleased to launch this pilot election monitoring program in 2014 in New Hampshire. Our attorneys and citizen volunteers will be using the same guidelines that guide the behavior for Department of Justice elections observers.
Judicial Watch has taken the lead in defending voter and other election integrity laws nationwide. And with your help, we will expand the New Hampshire Election Integrity Protection pilot program throughout the country in the years ahead.
We will stand watch not for parties or candidates (we don’t endorse or oppose candidates for public office), but for the American people. Our work in New Hampshire is essential and I am confident it will not only deter election fraud there but across the country.
Ping!
Obola is not even an American citizen.
WHERE ARE THE DOCUMENTS?
WHERE IS ONE DOCUMENT?
start by filing charges at the local level.
those people that were supposed to insure the integrity of the vote... but didn’t
a few of them start doing jail time and things will change quick
According to Polls, there are twice as many conservative in this country than there are liberals. Yet the liberals are in control.
Democrats thirst for the “votes” of foreigners.
OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!!!
TRAITORS!
A little late for this... WE HAD FOURTEEN YEARS
The NVRA ( National Voter Registration Act of 1993 AKA Motor Vote Act encourages voter fraud in my opinion as places where public assistance is provided also have to assist with voter registration. Add the same day register and vote BS. We know the public assistance offices are DEM hangouts in most larger cities and every illegal seems to get welfare of some kind now.
More evidence of Nathan Bedford's first Maxim of American politics:
All politics in America is not local but ultimately racial.
To wit:
The vote of a suppressed person of color should weigh more than the vote of someone who has white privilege.
I'm not kidding--this was told to me by a professor at the university I work at.
OK I’m on board! Election day is around the corner. What can the average freeper do to help?
From Wikipedia:
"Privilege is the sociological concept that some groups of people have advantages relative to other groups. The term is commonly used in the context of social inequality, particularly with regards to race, gender, age, sexual orientation, disability and social class.[1] Specific elements of privilege may be financial or material such as access to housing, education, and jobs,[1] as well as others that are emotional or psychological, such as a sense of personal self-confidence and comfortableness, or having a sense of belonging or worth in society.[2] It began as an academic concept, but has since become popular outside of academia.[3]" (emphasis supplied).
From the emphasized portion of the quotation we can see the hand of leftists at work.
I wonder if it was the same professor?
the only way to stop the [process is to hang the vote stealers.
A few hundred hangings will bring the process to a screeching halt
One halloween many a year ago, wifey/I decide to go to a movie. In broad daylight, I placed a container filled to brim with candy on a window sill in the front porch, with note to 'take 1, thankyou'. While walking the 20 feet to the car, the FIRST candy grouping managed to EMPTY the container. I didn't even manage to start the car before said candy was all gone.
Voter laws are the container of candy; votes are the candy itself; voter miscreants are the kids.
'Rats are just doing juvey type things with votes because we put it out there for them.
[this movie memory triggered by Levin's show last eve, where he tells a similar Halloween story]
“Obola is not even an American citizen.
WHERE ARE THE DOCUMENTS?”
If Obama truly is not a “natural born” US citizen, and is therefore unqualified to be president, the CIA and George W. Bush would have known the fact as he was rising to power. If Bush was aware documents existed proving Obama was ineligible for office, and failed to make the American people aware of the fact, he is an enabler of a violation of the Constitution and thereby violated his oath of office.
Given the recent revelation that the Bush administration decided not to publicize the weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq, at a time when the Democrats were using the claim that Bush lied about the weapons to great political advantage, the proposition that George Bush knew Obama wasn’t eligible but took no action to protect the nation seems believable. If Bush knew Obama was not eligible for the highest office in the land, it is likely Cheney, several senior administration officials and a number of lower level officials were aware as well.
This logic leads to two conclusions:
1) Obama really meets the qualifications and he has just been playing a public relations game by withholding documents in order to enrage Republicans and distract them from other actions. Documented proof in the hands of high level Bush administration officials would have been too big a secret not to leak.
2) Belief there is documentation Obama is ineligible requires belief dozens of people in the US government and Hawaiian government knew of the evidence and collaborated in keeping the secret. This conclusion implies a major conspiracy to defraud the American people. If the President Bush, and senior officials in his administration knew Barack Obama was ineligible for the office and failed to make the fact known to the American people, they violated their oaths of office and are guilty of treason.
Conclusion #1 is just dirty politics. Conclusion #2 suggests a high level conspiracy in the government and the active collaboration of both political parties in bringing on fundamental change to the government and economic system of the nation.
Whatever the truth, in 2008 Republican officials and officials in the 50 states responsible for certifying candidates, chose not to demand both candidates provide original documents providing eligibility for to serve in the office. It seems officials trusted the candidates to self qualify.
Go to North Carolina and vote over and over illegally to cancel out the illegal voters votes, duh!
The fact that our military personnel are being handcuffed in their combat missions, and their health is endangered by Ebola is because a fraudulently elected administration and a fraudulently elected congress was put into power by gibsmedats, illegal aliens, dead voters, and stupid females who want free birth control. IOW: Our Military personnel, our National Security, our Domestic economy, and our National Health are in constant jeopardy because of the treachery of the treasonous criminal syndicate calling itself the Democrat Party.
yes but, you must understand........ the military is the new peace corps.
How does one “say no” when the “legal system” won’t cooperate? Hate to say it, but until we start getting rowdy in large numbers, we will continue to lose - we act PC to appease those who act like animals while warning us to play nice - insanity all around. Big gatherings and vociferous demands seem to be the ticket these days and we outnumber those who keep eroding our freedoms with their own antics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.