Posted on 10/13/2014 11:53:54 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
New York Times best-selling author and long-time journalist Ed Klein said that Valerie Jarrett has been engaging in secret meetings with Sen. Elizabeth Warren in recent months, giving rise to speculations that the Massachusetts political newcomer is actually the administration’s choice to head the White House in 2016.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
I hope that she takes on Hillary. Mark Warner may have blown it already. Thanks to an inside leak that turned on him whom I suspect is a Clinton operative.
I’m not surprised at all. Obama hates the Clintons (and vice-versa), knows Biden hasn’t got a snowball’s chance in hades of getting elected, and that Warren would be as radical (or even moreso) than him if elected.
In Valerie Jarrett’s dreams!
Val Jar has made some serious mistakes in her decisions these past six years - if those indeed were HER decisions. I suspect those were not her decisions but those passed on from a group in Chicago.
It’s all about who would be best at covering-up King Eboma’s crimes long after he leaves office.
What they doin’ in secret?
Dems gotta be worried that the Pubbies won’t be nominating one of those “new tone” types in 2016.
Smoking a peace pipe???
Ed Klein is not a reliable source. Warren has been hitting Obama lately and that wouldn’t go over well with Jarrett. I’m inclined to not believe a word of this.
Is she a muslim too?
Warner will be Clinton II. All bluster, little action, focused on fun.
I just posted about this on the other thread...
This 'criticism' of Obama is actually just re-treaded Clintonian Triangulation.
For those not familiar with the stunt, it goes like this:
1. Profess 'concern' with someone's 'point of view'.
2. Pledge that you will not be aligned with that point of view, 'until significant changes are made'.
3. Don't mention it for a while.
4. Give an interview where you've suddenly come around, because the other person's point of view has 'changed'. When in fact, the only thing that changed was the liberal reporter's underwear (maybe)
Win!
How?
(sorry that was insensitive of me to use Indian lingo)
God help us all. Just the primaries listening to this idiots voice will be the death of many good people. She is a horrible person. Just horrible.
VJ has to have an insider Communist win the Whitehouse. If a Republican takes it, she’ll be facing death for High Treason. The whole lot of them will.
If Warren runs for the nomination the Clinton’s will have a Chernobyl like meltdown.
Anything that promotes a civil war with the lefties is good .
I do so agree with this sentiment. I am from Virginia. Mark Warner is a con man sneak turned politician. If he were a ethical descent person, it would be a different story.
More likely, a group in Teheran.
If Warren runs against Hilary, then Hilary will look like the better choice because Warren is a nut. This might actually HELP Hilary Clinton rather than hurt her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.