[SMGFan]

Wasn't there a right to privacy? /s

[Bobalu]

Pee Wee Herman does upskirt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTWlU5lTCUA

[headstamp 2]

So I guess it’s freedom of expression when a victim of one of these so-called photographers kicks their ass.

[ourworldawry]

“the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals said photos, like paintings, films and books, are “inherently expressive” and, therefore, are protected by the First Amendment.”

And the same shall apply when the one being victimized by this, CATCHES you.

[PAR35]

Really, shouldn’t Texas fathers, brothers, and husbands handle this problem themselves rather than wasting law enforcement and cop time?

[shove_it]

Hmmm. What if somebody took secret photos of the ‘privates’ of the 4th Court of Appeals judges in the court’s ‘public’ rest room and posted them on line? According to their ruling, that’s OK, no?

[Dallas59]

[mikey_hates_everything]

[muir_redwoods]

If a willing model wants to pose for such a photo perhaps that’s protected by the 1st amendment. If some woman is victimized by a voyeur photographer that’s a sort of assault that should bring serious punishment.

[Dallas59]

[rawcatslyentist]

Feel free to get your freak on, just as long as you don’t mention Jesus or his Father!

[BlueLancer]

I guess I’ll have to start wearing my kilt more often then ...

[bgill]

The judge must enjoy having her nether regions photographed and posted all over the internet because you know that’s going to happen. Hope she doesn’t have kids or they’ll be used for some perv’s pleasure and she will only have herself to blame when nothing can be done to stop it.

[a fool in paradise]

Did someone ask for pictures?

[TalBlack]

Just out of curiosity, can you video a cop in TX?