If you look at total liquids, as the article has discussed, it has gone up and down in that time, still down from the peak but not a continuous trend.
Posted on 09/09/2014 2:23:02 PM PDT by thackney
Meaning that if one wishes to be realistic, what will happen cannot be predicted.
It is a sure thing that if demand was allowed to drive supply, as it would in a world without libtards, socialists and communists, energy disruptions (and their repercussions) would be less frequent and less severe.
US consumption has been going down since 2003.
Energy from his high frequency generator. He was using wireless energy transmission, not magic energy creation.
It works, but it has greater losses than wired transmission, not to mention the effects on living beings if it had been ramped up to the sizes he imagined.
We’ve been in recession since ’08 . . .
If you look at total liquids, as the article has discussed, it has gone up and down in that time, still down from the peak but not a continuous trend.
The enviros would tie them up in court for decades.....................
Then we should have started decades ago. All the more reason to start now.
When the price of liquid fuel goes high enough the environs will be tarred and feathered if they are lucky and burned at the stake if they are not.
Start what?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.