... world's first hydrogen reactor for reduction of unlimited hydrogen ...

Kochari ^ | July 22, so14 | Solar Hydrogen Trends

[mike70]

Can we do the base-metals into gold thing, now?

[DuncanWaring]

Silly me.

[FredZarguna]

Fissioning atoms lighter than Lead consumes energy.
Fusioning atoms heavier than Lead consumes energy.

Not quite true, as the graph below shows. While Lead is the "stable" endpoint of a large number of decay chains involving heavy isotopes, the atomic number of lead (Z=82) is WAY too high for the claim your making; the nuclear force is not stabilizing enough to overcome the repulsion of that many protons.

Fission of Lead produces energy, IF you can find a favorable nuclear reaction kinetics to produce it. The chart below shows the break-even point, which is all the way down at the where the derivative of the binding energy per nucleon goes to zero, at Iron (Z=26.)

The corrected statement is:

Fissioning atoms lighter than Iron consumes energy.
Fusioning atoms heavier than Iron consumes energy.

[AZLiberty]

Kevmo?

'Fraid not. When I found this LENR news, I looked for Kevmo, but learned he had been zotted in a fiery interaction with JimRob. No cold fusion involved.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

well said

[AZLiberty]

Fissioning atoms lighter than Iron consumes energy.

If this statement is correct, it debunks the oxygen to hydrogen mechanism proposed -- lock, stock, and barrel.

[Cold Heat]

Heck......sorry I missed that...would have been a popcorn and beer moment.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

The final blow ended up not being one of kevmo's amusing LENR Riddler-like rants, but it was the moron actually claiming to be a better conservative than JimRob.

Here

[Cold Heat]

Now that’s kinda amusing. Nothing I have not seen before, but amusing nonetheless.

I always figured old Kevno would self destruct on a LENR argument...lol

[Telepathic Intruder]

One look at the nuclear binding energy curve will tell you it is impossible to get energy by splitting oxygen into hydrogen. You can only get energy if you split atoms that are at least heavier than iron.

[FredZarguna]

If this statement is correct, it debunks the oxygen to hydrogen mechanism proposed -- lock, stock, and barrel.

There's no "if." This is a well established fact. The mathematical details of how much energy would be involved to convert one mole of water molecules (18 grams) to hydrogen can be found at post #50 of this thread.

[alexander_busek]

The corrected statement is: Fissioning atoms lighter than Iron consumes energy. Fusioning atoms heavier than Iron consumes energy.

Yes... Iron!

Seemed to recall that all matter will eventually (in on the order of 10^14 years) decay to Iron.

Regards,

[dila813]

lol, Bala is slang for crap