Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gungor drifts from biblical orthodoxy [Christian musician decides Scripture not accurate]
World Magazine ^ | 8/2/14 | Jeff Koch

Posted on 08/07/2014 2:41:18 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: CatherineofAragon

I recently met a wonderful man (in many respects) We had a couple of nice dates, but it’s just not going to work, ever.

We both feel such peace with each other and like each other’s company very much but although he was a Baptist preacher for 25 years, now he won’t go in a church at all. (that’s not even the problem)

He doesn’t believe in the Bible anymore. He holds his views as truth and everyone who believes in the Bible as unenlightened and wrong. His proof? He believes them, that’s it. There’s more, but that’s enough here.
I was SO disappointed.


21 posted on 08/07/2014 5:37:48 PM PDT by Shimmer1 (Ok, the joke's over. Bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
The Bible communicates with us in a number of different ways. Metaphors are metaphors, poetry is poetry, etc...and context is also important. When Jesus was speaking in parables, He made that fact clear. When He was speaking plainly, I imagine He expected us to be able to figure that out.

Context (including genre) matters a great deal, and quite frankly, American fundamentalist interpretations don't usually take into account the first-century Jewish context the biblical writers wrote in. Remember, the biblical writers wrote as Jews in a particular place and time, to other Jews (and a few Gentiles) in particular places and times.

What we have in the Gospels is not Jesus speaking, but his faithful eyewitnesses' accounts of his speaking. We have no indication that Jesus had twenty-first century American Christians in mind when he was preaching, nor that 'he expected us to be able to figure it out' without any research into the context of his first-century Jewish culture--nor should we expect first-century Jewish culture to transliterate perfectly into our own twenty-first century American experiences.

22 posted on 08/07/2014 5:53:22 PM PDT by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
So, it’s not clear cut, but I think He had a reason for choosing to portray himself that way.

I agree--but that reason may have been simply that given the male-dominated culture of ancient Israel (consider that a woman's testimony was worthless to first-century Jews--and consider the fact that the first witnesses of the Resurrection were all women too), that was the best way to reach the people he called to be his chosen people.

23 posted on 08/07/2014 5:56:55 PM PDT by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

That really is sad. I wonder what on earth happened to him to make him lose his faith. He needs prayer.

I don’t blame you for recognizing that it couldn’t work. I’d think it would be so painful, knowing that the man I cared about had rejected God.

I hope you’re doing well otherwise, Shimmer.


24 posted on 08/07/2014 6:03:47 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

And he was a Baptist preacher?

Something happened...just like the guy who worked with Billy Graham and died still insisting Jesus didn’t rise from the dead.

Very sad.

I have known of ministers, too, who fell away. Paul, too, had fellow workers who abandoned the faith.

:(


25 posted on 08/07/2014 6:19:36 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Grammarian
American fundamentalist interpretations don't usually take into account the first-century Jewish context the biblical writers wrote in.

You are correct that the context is critical, especially to the audience and the occasion of the write.

Bit you apparently don't know many American fundamentalists. Or you are defining the term very, very tightly.

The first rule of exegesis for any commentator is to look at the original context. And whatever conclusions or extrapolations any theologian may draw, the ones I see generally do their best to deal first with the context in its original state.

26 posted on 08/07/2014 6:26:56 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
You are correct that the context is critical, especially to the audience and the occasion of the write. Bit you apparently don't know many American fundamentalists. Or you are defining the term very, very tightly.

I'm defining 'fundamentalist' the same way Dr Olson defines it in his post here, although I'm also thinking of my own experiences with people on the fringes of Pentecostalism (i.e. the "Word of Faith" movement).

27 posted on 08/07/2014 7:12:57 PM PDT by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

It is a core belief of the Traditional Christian Faith that God reveals Himself through his Word AND through his creation.

If the clear evidence of His Creation contradicts your interpretation of His Word then you should prayerfully reflect on your interpretation of His Word.

That is how a Faithful person approaches the question.


28 posted on 08/07/2014 7:59:23 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Yep, for 25 years. What apparently happened was that he put his reasoning above the Most High. We talked a long time about it.


29 posted on 08/07/2014 10:04:23 PM PDT by Shimmer1 (Ok, the joke's over. Bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Thank you Catherine, I’m not in any pain or discomfort. I’m just waiting on a surgery date.


30 posted on 08/07/2014 10:05:28 PM PDT by Shimmer1 (Ok, the joke's over. Bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

.... or he never was ....

.... or he has fallen into carnality .....


31 posted on 08/08/2014 6:11:42 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

Let me know how things are going. Freepmail me anytime, or ping me to any threads you might put up. I’m keeping you in prayer.


32 posted on 08/08/2014 7:44:52 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: The Grammarian

Ah. A friend of mine thinks that Bell is the greatest thing since fire.


33 posted on 08/08/2014 8:51:02 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson