Why is Planned Parenthood Running Away From the Term “Pro-Choice?”

Life News ^ | 8/4/14 | Jill Stanek

[Straight Vermonter]

Strangely, it’s re-branding w/o a brand. Usually, when you drop one brand-name, you have another to replace it. Not so here.

Probably they are ready for government to decide who can have children and who cannot. They can't have "choice" be an option.

[informavoracious]

Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America [said] “I just think the ‘pro-choice’ language doesn’t really resonate particularly with a lot of young women voters.”…

Maybe it's not just the "language" that's not resonating with them. Maybe it's the actuality of what you do. These girls have grown up in an age where there have always been ultrasounds. They KNOW it's a BABY.

[Campion]

That’s definitely the ultimate goal.

[all the best]

Choice is so at odds with the “progressive”/leftist agenda.

[DPMD]

Given that we’re being force fed the phony “war on women,” don’t be surprised to see something like Champions of Reproductive Refugees.

[Salman]

On the other hand, "pro-life" is still pro-life.

No need to run away from that label, right? ;)

[Morgana]

“Big Murder no longer even wants to pretend that they believe in “choice,” they want to kill babies and nothing else. “

Naw it’s that they know most women either don’t have a choice or don’t feel they have a choice.

[BobL]

I thought they now use the term “women’s health” or “sexual health” to describe abortion services.