“Incidental”?! So does that mean it’s optional?
Honestly how can they think it’s “incidental” to the purpose of the law? It’s a key component of the law, to incentivize people to buy health insurance! Without it no one would have any incentive to buy it.
Although, I guess that loophole in the law that prevents the IRS from forcefully collecting it comes into play here. Well played Nancy, well played.
Of course now that that loophole has served it’s purpose look for it to be quietly closed. If not by actual legal means, by a mere stroke of the pen and a phone call.
It’s optional to these leftist activist judges but the Constitution isn’t optional, no matter how they want to put it.
If it’s incidental to the law, then clipping it out isn’t a big deal, especially since it violates the Constitution.