Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Has Two Abortions Because She Didn’t Want to Share Her Husband With Her Children
Life News ^ | 7/24/14 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 07/24/2014 12:32:39 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: wagglebee

41 posted on 07/24/2014 1:54:47 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

My BIL felt this way about children. He didn’t want to share his wife with them.
So my sister is childless.


42 posted on 07/24/2014 1:56:53 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Imagine a Venn diagram: “birth control” includes all means of preventing birth. “Contraception”, is a sub-set of birth control; whereby conception is prevented. Abortion is a sub-set of birth control; whereby conception takes place, but the embryo is “terminated” sometime prior to birth. There is absolutely no overlap between contraception and abortion.

If you have trouble with that concept; try differentiating between “up” and “down”, or “day” and “night” for practice.


43 posted on 07/24/2014 2:08:30 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Yeah, but for people like that who are dedicated to not breeding, they should just get themselves fixed to avoid having to murder their own offspring.


44 posted on 07/24/2014 2:15:45 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

You nigh have trouble with ‘mindset’ whereby a relationship, and subsequently, the community and then culture, industry and politics, if the idea is powerful enough, is set on birth control

Abortion comes from that

So do a lot of other consequences. Just ask and answer, where is the quisling husband in all of this? It’s just she who is selfish in our new world order. He gets to live the life of a 17 year old boy, with societal approval. That’s birth control.

The philosophers and theologians are of that theory.
To start:

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html


45 posted on 07/24/2014 2:20:44 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man; wagglebee
No doubt she shouldn't raise kids. She shouldn't murder them, either.

Why wouldn't she let somebody adopt the baby who would love him? Has she no family, no friends, no imgination of the joy that would bring, joy for generations to come?

Now, no joy, and an eternity of horror.

46 posted on 07/24/2014 2:21:41 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: definitelynotaliberal

It’s not really a “bright side,” but gallows humor has served my people well in troubling times.

There were joke competitions in Auschwitz, you know.


47 posted on 07/24/2014 2:22:39 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

The underlying attitudes lead to murder

Some afternoon philosophy for you


48 posted on 07/24/2014 2:24:50 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

yeah, i suppose so.


49 posted on 07/24/2014 2:24:53 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ugly SOUL, UGLY FACE. God will NOT be mocked.


50 posted on 07/24/2014 2:35:37 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

WHY did my GAYDAR go off looking at the “husband”??


51 posted on 07/24/2014 2:36:05 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Let’s check back in a few years—likely he’ll be cheating on her...


52 posted on 07/24/2014 2:56:40 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I regretted the snark in my post, right after sending it.

However, terminology does matter — and your original post was phrased as a question about terminology. We saw, in the Hobby Lobby brouhaha, how the other side plays fast and loose with terminology. They deliberately drew no distinction between “contraceptives” and “abortifacients” — either lumping them together in the super-set of “birth control” (which you did also), or completely mislabeling “abortifacients” as “contraceptives” (which are not the same thing at all).

Other than the problem with terminology, I agree with you.


53 posted on 07/24/2014 4:13:55 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

I lump them all together as the Church does, they all come from the same mode of thinking, the same addictions and all lead to the same ends.

The other side sees it that way as well.

This side can NOT win in a state of moral relativism. The other side will take advantage of that weakness every time, and that’s what is going on.

The theologians and Christian philosophers state that birth control is evil, leads to evil and cannot be adhered to without great consequences.

That’s what you’re seeing.

This is a surprisingly short read. It takes a bit of concentration, but it is logical, so it is available. It was published in 1968.

Just read it.

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html


54 posted on 07/24/2014 4:19:32 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson