Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Diego-area community expected to reject illegal immigrant shelter
Reutersa ^ | 7/22/2014 | Marty Graham

Posted on 07/22/2014 11:03:22 PM PDT by South40

SAN DIEGO (Reuters) - A Southern California city will put itself at the center of a nationwide debate over illegal immigration on Tuesday evening when officials there are expected to reject a bid by the U.S. government to open a shelter for unaccompanied migrant children.

The vote by planning commissioners in Escondido, 20 miles north of San Diego, comes amid a surge in children from Central America caught entering the United States, overwhelming federal processing facilities, threatening to swamp immigration courts and creating a backlash in border-state communities.

Escondido commissioners voted tentatively last month to reject a bid by federal authorities to open the shelter following angry opposition from residents. They are expected to make that decision final during a meeting on Tuesday evening, despite pleas from immigrant rights groups.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens

1 posted on 07/22/2014 11:03:22 PM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: South40

Didn’t Escondido try to pass a law preventing illegals from renting housing? Are the feds stupid or just trying to pick a fight?


2 posted on 07/22/2014 11:11:31 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Both.


3 posted on 07/22/2014 11:12:04 PM PDT by South40 (Hillary Clinton was a "great secretary of state". - Texas Governor Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: South40

So the ACLU says we have a legal and moral obligation to take care of these people. What is the legal part?

If we’re going to do anything it should be to focus on the source - the countries they left and why are they so violent. My husband has been down there and he said it was bad - lots of women who just went missing, villages ruled by people with baseball bats. Actually, we won’t even go to Mexico anymore.


4 posted on 07/22/2014 11:39:20 PM PDT by Aria ( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria
So the ACLU says we have a legal and moral obligation to take care of these people. What is the legal part?

Either you aid, abet, and provide material support to someone who is prima facie breaking the law, or you are rasis or something.

5 posted on 07/22/2014 11:53:59 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aria

So the ACLU says we have a legal and moral obligation to take care of these people. What is the legal part?
*******************************
Agree with your question.

If the ACLU, LULAC, La Raza bunch, along with Luis Guitierrez, Pelosi, Grijalva and others, feel so strongly about this then they should provide the funding to TEMPORARILY house, provide medical attention and feed the tens of thousands of illegals crashing our border!


6 posted on 07/23/2014 3:20:35 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson