Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy is evaluating MBDA’s Dual Mode Brimstone for its F/A-18 Super Hornet jets
Navy Recognition ^ | 18 July 2014

Posted on 07/18/2014 12:02:31 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Navy Recognition has learned that the U.S. Navy is beginning environmental and integration analysis of the UK’s combat proven Dual Mode Brimstone missile for F/A-18 Super Hornets. This activity is funded and being managed by the US Navy. Additionally, two recent positive reports from committees of the U.S Congress have expanded the funding in Fiscal Year 2015 by $10M for Dual Mode Brimstone on F/A-18s and asked for the Secretary of Defense’s views on dual mode missile technology. This news is matched by the UK MOD funding BAE Systems 5M British Pounds to begin an integration analysis of Dual Mode Brimstone on the Eurofighter Typhoon.

A legacy U.S. Navy F/A-18 Hornet undergoing a fit-check with MMW-seeker Brimstone missiles in 2005 (US Navy Photo).

According to a May 2014 report of the Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives: "The committee continues to recommend that the Department of Defense pursue an all-weahter, moving target-capable tactical missile that could be integrated on different military platforms. [...] The Committee is particularly interested in capabilities to counter high-speed, erratically maneuvering targets on land and at sea, as well as understanding how dual mode missiles could be used in counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Subcommittee notes the use of dual mode missiles, to include allied missile programs, could potentially close existing operational gaps, reduce the risk of collateral damage, and may result in cost savings relative to current tactics, techniques, and procedures used as part of current direct action CT operation."

CGI of an F/A-18E Super Hornet fitted with 12x Dual Mode Brimstone missiles

"The Subcommittee is aware of the recent integration and successful testing of a fully operational dual mode missile off an MQ-9 “Reaper” unmanned aerial vehicle system for the United Kingdom Ministry of Defense. The Committee notes the Royal Air Force has used this dual mode missile extensively in overseas contingency operations and has reported positive feedback. Further, the Subcommittee is also aware that the Secretary of the Navy is funding an initial analysis of dual mode missile integration on the F/A-18E/F “Super Hornet” aircraft and that initial feedback has been positive."

Contacted by Navy Recognition, the U.S. Navy F/A-18 and EA-18G Program Office (PMA-265) made the following comment: PMA-265 has reviewed the news release and does not have any input at this time. NAVAIR continually works with the fleet and the resource sponsors to prioritize, develop, integrate, test and field improvements for the F/A-18 family of aircraft. The F/A-18 program office will remain flexible based on the priorities set forth by the President’s Budget.

Video: MBDA/Qinetiq

In addition, MBDA just announced during Farnbourgh Air Show it has successfully demonstrated its Dual Mode BRIMSTONE missile against fast moving and manoeuvring Fast Inshore Attack Craft even in a cluttered environment with multiple neutral vessels in very close proximity.

Conducted in March and April 2014 at the QinetiQ managed Aberporth range in west Wales, UK, an RAF Tornado GR4 aircraft fired two Dual Mode BRIMSTONE missiles (one telemetry and one operational), each fitted with MBDA’s latest Anti-FIAC software upgrades, at remotely controlled, 40ft ASV C13 Fast Inshore Attack Craft targets powered by twin 350hp engines.

The telemetry missile achieved a direct hit on the FIAC’s engines with the target operating at its maximum achievable speed in ‘low sea state 4’ conditions. The operational missile achieved a direct hit at the rear of the second FIAC’s cabin, destroying and sinking the target which was operating at maximum achievable speeds in ‘sea state 3’ conditions. Missile impact occurred whilst the target was within very close proximity to three neutral vessels. The target was destroyed and sunk with the single shot and with no collateral damage to the neutral vessels.

These tests confirmed Dual Mode BRIMSTONE’s first pass precision and lethality against challenging targets in stressing environments. The dual mode Semi-Active Laser and active MMW (millimetric wave) radar seeker works in tandem to provide a unique ability to selectively engage a specific target irrespective of target speed or manoeuvre even when in cluttered, congested and high collateral risk environments.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brimstone; mbda; superhornet; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/18/2014 12:02:31 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The USAF and USMC needs to dump the F-35 and go with Super Hornets. At least they work.
Which, of course, will screw all the people we suckered into buying into the F-35 program. I guess we need to provide F/A-18s to them as well. Though I don’t know what the UK will do with their V/STOL carriers.


2 posted on 07/18/2014 12:08:20 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

That ship has already sailed. The 35s are already being integrated at Cherry Point.


3 posted on 07/18/2014 12:22:35 PM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

Well, I feel sorry for its adopters:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/3180824/posts


4 posted on 07/18/2014 12:25:36 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Gradual modifications to the F-16, F-15 and F-18 to improve maneuverability and stealthiness would have made them better than the F-35 for a fraction of the cost.


5 posted on 07/18/2014 12:28:14 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Another UK missile we adopted..Hellfire.


6 posted on 07/18/2014 12:32:47 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

wasn’t Obama trying to cancel the Hellfire?


7 posted on 07/18/2014 12:34:07 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

You are aware that critics said much the same thing about the Hornet, right? It wasn’t as good a fighter as the Tomcat, wasn’t as good a strike platform as the Intruder or even the A-7 Corsair. Used to call them Lawn Darts. I suspect the F-35 will turn out to be a great Strike-Fighter. It’ll just cost us a zillion bucks (more).


8 posted on 07/18/2014 12:41:42 PM PDT by Afterguard (Liberals will let you do anything you want, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

So now we have hellfire and brimstone missiles in the inventory?


9 posted on 07/18/2014 12:44:23 PM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I think you’re correct. A10 Warthog...again.


10 posted on 07/18/2014 12:49:35 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard

I hope you are correct.
All things considered, modern aircraft are so elaborate, it is amazing that get designed and built at all!


11 posted on 07/18/2014 12:54:15 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard
wasn’t as good a strike platform as the Intruder or even the A-7 Corsair

talk about ancient

12 posted on 07/18/2014 1:04:05 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Well, I am that old. They were contemporary platforms in my 22 year Navy career. :-)


13 posted on 07/18/2014 1:11:57 PM PDT by Afterguard (Liberals will let you do anything you want, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

Please explain. Hellfire was US developed.


14 posted on 07/18/2014 1:19:48 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard

didn’t they still use A-6’s as electronic warfare planes recently?


15 posted on 07/18/2014 1:20:50 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard

Oops...

some still in service according to Wiki


16 posted on 07/18/2014 1:22:04 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I'm 54 yrs. old and worked for Hughes at NAS Lemoore assembling, operating, and maintaining the F/A-18 Weapons trainers and flight simulators which trained the first operational flight crews for the first work up cruise on the Connie CV-64, as they transitioned from A-7's, some Marines from the last F4's, transfers from A-6's and can remember modifying the 2E7's and OFT's to match upgraded lot numbers and than going from A models to B models to C and D models, and now they call them legacy Hornet's.

The Connie is gone, VFA125 disbanded, and now I feel my age, and many of the old birds are still flying! Don't think Shifty made admiral, Wheels up Wesh beached the Enterprise, Spiker was down in Iraq, and everyone wanted to transfer to Canoe Bay.

17 posted on 07/18/2014 1:35:41 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What is a “Dual Mode” missile ?


18 posted on 07/18/2014 1:37:39 PM PDT by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timocrat

Both IR and laser guided (IR/SAL) and or datalink targeting as well with some weapons.


19 posted on 07/18/2014 1:43:29 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mat_Helm

IR = Infrared - heat seeking (LOS) line of sight with weapons directed seeker head and or auto lock caged or uncaged, or laser lock from a target designator and or FLIR pod or FAC blazing.


20 posted on 07/18/2014 1:49:27 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson