Posted on 07/15/2014 11:49:09 AM PDT by Kaslin
As tens of thousands of unaccompanied children from Central America spill over our southern border, millions of disregarded black kids remain confined to war-like ghettoes across the United States. If the level of violence occurring every day in urban black communities popped up anywhere else, does anyone believe liberals would pretend not to notice?
Apparently, as long as a significant element of urban blacks are content to destroy each other, the Democrat Party seems more than happy to go on supporting them with taxpayer money. Of course, the individuals most responsible for annihilating these neighborhoods -- along with their children who inherit their addiction -- are those individuals most strung out on the government’s ghoulish compassion peddled by the Democrat Party.
On the other hand, the illegal immigrants who are fleeing barbaric countries spark a more vocal hysteria into liberals everywhere. They simultaneously make demands for immediate amnesty -- which, of course, would do nothing to stop the tsunami of people coming here illegally, since Democrats refuse to seal the border. Yet liberals fall over each other to parade their sanctimony before the media. They clamor about “immigration reform” and children from countries terrorized by drug cartels; meanwhile, more urban black kids become murder victims of gang violence, and the liberal majority pretends not to notice.
In general, however, magnanimous words and feigned compassion regarding Central America’s children will persuade the average liberal to the Democrats’ bizarre panacea: entitlements for everyone. To progressives, pouring hard-earned-taxpayer money down an endless hole in the southern border means nothing -- much like financing the self-destruction of many urban blacks doesn’t seem to bother them, either. For liberals, good intentions trump terrible consequences, and giving away other people’s money may serve as some twisted therapy to cope with the internal shame of exploiting impoverished people for political gains. But most of us understand that financing other human beings’ self-destruction is morbid -- even when liberals call it “compassionate help.”
Regardless, when the subject comes back to the mayhem and lawlessness destroying black children and their hope for better lives in merciless cities like Chicago, St. Louis, New Orleans, Detroit, and Washington DC, liberals immediately cast accusations of racism and lecture the rest of us on their delusional theories of tolerance and multiculturalism. This tactic, however, continues to end most discussions rather quickly.
But come to think of it, when was the last time Nancy Pelosi stated publicly that she wished she could take all of America’s urban black children home with her? Granted, liberal correctness would destroy a normal person for making a statement like that. Everyone knows liberal attack dogs are trained to leap in to action, growling with accusations of some sinister white arrogance that serves to deprive “children of color” of a connection to their cultural roots -- you know, like being murdered in gang violence as a result of Mom being hooked on paralyzing welfare and thus incapable of escaping the ghetto. But Pelosi carries a liberal badge; she operates with impunity. Her pious sap is all that matters.
Everyone knows Pelosi was disingenuous in her statement concerning her self-righteous wish that all the children from Central America could come home with her. Despite the fact Pelosi is almost always disingenuous, why hasn’t anyone asked her what is stopping her now from providing a home for one or two of those unaccompanied children? Talk about a moment to lead by example. Maybe she knows that the president might never end this “opportunity,” as Pelosi describes it. And maybe she knows she would be stuck with the kids forever. Yes, only Pelosi would know for sure.
Nevertheless, the congresswoman has unwittingly spawned an incredible chance for the Democrat Party to prove its genuine benevolence. Since the administration is already abandoning the children from Central America in working-class communities across the country, Pelosi’s wish should open the doors to every privileged-liberal household nationwide -- you know, actually putting their homes where their mouths are.
Although the nation’s first half-black president vehemently opposes school vouchers (an educational opportunity for urban black children to rise above the ghetto), perhaps he would consider signing an executive order inspired by Pelosi’s heart-felt wish. The order would simply compel every wealthy liberal who voted for the president to provide a cultural-exchange home for “troubled” black children from America’s most violent inner cities. Who cares if Pelosi herself could opt out?
Just imagine the celebration that would take place among good black children at the mere thought of ridding their schools and neighborhoods of all the hoodlums currently destroying them. Then again, the president could just as easily abandon these troubled youths in plush neighborhoods, basically like his administration is doing with the immigrant children in more modest communities like Murrieta, California. However, a more coordinated effort to place these disruptive kids in the homes of rich liberals would be far better.
Just think of how these big-hearted and tolerant liberals would finally benefit firsthand from this fantastically compassionate multicultural experience. Based on liberal theories, high-performing public school districts, like Fairfax County Virginia’s, would immediately be complemented by an influx of a radically different urban culture. Additionally, conservatives would finally see their own foolishness as multicultural bliss blossomed in areas currently deprived of this unique urban culture.
Surely the media could just ignore the immediate improvement in inner-city schools brought about by just having order and discipline once again. And certainly the high-performing schools in America’s wealthiest communities would have their new culturally diverse students getting better results than the ghetto schools in almost no time. Just sharing rich liberals’ wealth and homes with struggling urban youths would absolutely help them just as much as sharing America’s entitlements helps illegal immigrants.
Let’s face it. Is there really any difference, aside from black children being documented Americans?
Hey Pelowiwench....your doors are always unlocked, right?
Thought so, you ignorant sl**.
Ok nan. You and dianne and barby go first. And a certain mansion in chit-cago isn’t currently being used by the owners. Open ‘em up.
Liberals have thrown blacks under the bus. Especially Obama and his coordinated plan to allow tens of thousands of “refugees” in.
And the blacks are steaming. Daily we are reading more and more commentaries and editorials by blacks who are seeing the obvious.
Give it time. They’re going to start demanding border residents house illegals. Since it won’t be “soldiers,” they can’t claim a violation of the 3rd Amendment’s quartering act, but it’s the same damn thing.
I still think the Presidio is a perfect place for a tent city. Nice weather, nice views, a multitude of services paid for by a wealthy city, lots of rich liberals around...lovely place.
That’s too obvious an imposition. They’re flying planeloads of child illegals into the heartland. No city in flyover country is safe now.
Besides, Pelosi the liberal rich b!tch must have tens of thousands of underutilized square footage in her many mansions to accommodate the invasion of the `innocents’.
Put your mansions where your mouth is, Nan!
The illegals will overwhelm schools as they’re distributed out into the country .... wonder how many illegal kids will end up at Sidwell Friends? Fair is fair, hmmmm? [/s]
Nancy Pelosi stated publicly that she wished she could take all of the Central American illegals home with her
The good ol’ San Fran Nanny has plenty of space to take care all those teeming masses and to give them a place stay.
She can offer them more than adequate accommodations.
Pelosi, in addition to being House Monority Leader, is a multi-millionaire investor who owns a large stake in an exclusive resort hotel in Wine Country, the Napa Valley Auberge Du Soleil Resort.
What better place to park a crew of illiterate illegals unscreened for drug resistant TB, scabies, whooping cough, lice , ringworm and bed bugs.
Great responses, all of them so far.
“I still think the Presidio is a perfect place for a tent city”
I think a few tent cities in Martha’s Vineyard, would be much better, hell I will donate money for the tents. Although, the more tent cities the better
Maybe someone can drop a bus load of the children pussy Pelosi is talking about, in her front yard, then drive away. Have some cameras ready to catch her reaction. Yeah, she surly does want to take them home with her. HA Ha
Even in SF she could put up at leas 12 kids, if she bunked them, 3 bunks (6 kids) in one bedroom, 3 bunks (6 kids) in the second bedroom, that leaves the master bedroom for her and hubby.
Pelosi received a fax today asking her to open up her home.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3180664/posts
Sh...t, I mean, they are looking to repopulate the abandoned crack houses of Detroit... Why not.
Now we see why the squating rules are so in favor of squaters. Who knows, maybe the housing crisis was meant to reoccupy all those homes with illegals. What a boon. More mortgage turn over for Jp Morgan until the houses get lost again.
Busing again...
In that meeting one woman gave a rambling comment about compassion and all of us being one during which she said she would like to see the county survey residents to determine who had grown children who are on their own to see if they lived in homes larger than they need with extra bedrooms to make available to house migrant workers and maybe their families.
This is how liberal ideas get started.
You first, LIB asses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.