Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court bans warrantless cell phone searches, updates privacy laws (for 21st century)
www.washingtontimes.com ^ | Updated: 10:37 a.m. on Wednesday, June 25, 2014 | By Stephen Dinan

Posted on 06/25/2014 7:59:26 AM PDT by Red Badger

The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that police cannot go snooping through people’s cell phones without a warrant, in a unanimous decision that amounts to a major statement in favor of privacy rights.

Police agencies had argued that searching through the data on cell phones was no different than asking someone to turn out his pockets, but the justices rejected that, saying a cell phone is more fundamental.

The ruling amounts to a 21st century update to legal understanding of privacy rights.

“The fact that technology now allows an individual to carry such information in his hand does not make the information any less worthy of the protection for which the Founders fought,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for the unanimous court.

“Our answer to the question of what police must do before searching a cell phone seized incident to an arrest is accordingly simple— get a warrant.”

Justices even said police cannot check a cellphone’s call log, saying even those contain more information that just phone numbers, and so perusing them is a violation of privacy that can only be justified with a warrant.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: 2ndthread; cellphone; cellphones; fakecelltowers; obamaphone; privacy; scotus; stingray; surveillance; towerdump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2014 7:59:26 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Unanimous decision! Wow! I am impressed! I figured that at least a few would go the East German route.


2 posted on 06/25/2014 8:03:54 AM PDT by Gunpowder green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wow, the ruling is really broad! They even banned police from glancing at the list of recent calls. Basically they can’t touch your phone without a search warrant. The big nanny statists aren’t happy today....


3 posted on 06/25/2014 8:03:58 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

But the NSA can do whatever they want...


4 posted on 06/25/2014 8:06:53 AM PDT by BreezyDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Hard to believe!


5 posted on 06/25/2014 8:07:58 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunpowder green
Unanimous decision! Wow! I am impressed! I figured that at least a few would go the East German route.

I suspect that emperor Hussein and the inner circle of his regime are saying "SCOTUS decided that, now let THEM enforce it - it will be business as usual in the Socialist States of Amerika".

6 posted on 06/25/2014 8:08:06 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ("Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle?" - Patrick Henry, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is funny. Now WHO is going to enforce this “law”? Eric Holder??


7 posted on 06/25/2014 8:08:08 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

They have cell phones as well...................


8 posted on 06/25/2014 8:09:29 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,743 threads and 84,837 replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Yes, is this still the case as in wire tapping.... Yes they cannot use what they find in your phone, without a search warrant in court against you, but they can still look through it if they want? As in current wire tap laws, doesn’t stop them from listening, just using it in court.

NSA comes to mind..


9 posted on 06/25/2014 8:10:33 AM PDT by Quick Shot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Satire?


10 posted on 06/25/2014 8:10:49 AM PDT by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

This is a case where there is no active enforcement procedure. They cannot use any evidence in court that is procured thru the search of a cell phone without a warrant.................


11 posted on 06/25/2014 8:11:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,743 threads and 84,837 replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: loungitude

No..................


12 posted on 06/25/2014 8:11:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,743 threads and 84,837 replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BreezyDog

Amen to that and all of the other remaining intelligence agencies...they’ll just hide behind this curtain “The court did carve out exceptions for “exigencies” that arise, such as major security threats.”


13 posted on 06/25/2014 8:12:02 AM PDT by ebersole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Does mean leo has to turn over their STINGRAY equipment?


14 posted on 06/25/2014 8:14:10 AM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BreezyDog

Change starts with a single act....so maybe the tide has begun with the Supremes.


15 posted on 06/25/2014 8:14:24 AM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I have a hard time understanding legal jargon.

Does anyone know if this means that they can’t confiscate your cell phone during a traffic stop or other stop? Just wondering if it doesn’t mean much if they can take it anyway and then wait to search until they have a warrant.

In other words, will be have time to smash the phone and destroy it, much like the IRS, before they can use it against us?


16 posted on 06/25/2014 8:15:42 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
"SCOTUS decided that, now let THEM enforce it"

A famous quote from another genocidal Democrat (Andrew Jackson)

17 posted on 06/25/2014 8:16:03 AM PDT by HOYA97 (twitter @hoya97)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: No Socialist

Essentially you are correct. They must wait for a warrant. They cannot even look at the call log. To obtain a warrant, they must prove to a judge that one is necessary for them to see what’s on the phone in order to prosecute the crime that is at hand, not just snoop to see what they can find...................


18 posted on 06/25/2014 8:18:06 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,743 threads and 84,837 replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

A supreme court ruling carries exactly how much weight under the obama regime?

A pen, a phone, a threat, a drone. All in your future if you dare go against the wishes of the obama regime.


19 posted on 06/25/2014 8:26:58 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The Surpeme Cout is a CARTOON..


20 posted on 06/25/2014 8:29:46 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson