Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Photos Show Lake Powell Half Full
livescience.com ^ | May 23, 2014 09:37am ET | Stephanie Pappas

Posted on 05/25/2014 9:58:25 AM PDT by ckilmer

The mud-choked Colorado River flows through the dry lakebed of northern Lake Powell in a new satellite image released yesterday (May 22).

Western drought has left this reservoir on the border of Utah and Arizona less than half full, the satellite image captured on May 13 reveals. As of May 21, the lake was at 42 percent of capacity, according to U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) data.

(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: coloradoriver; g42; lakepowell; powell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: ckilmer

In addition to hydroelectric power, and recreation, Lake Powell was created to accommodate storage for runoff to mitigate flooding and erosion, and otherwise store “excess” water for irrigation and dry periods...

As of May 25, 2014, according to Colorado SNOTEL Snowpack Update Report, based on Mountain Data from NRCS SNOTEL Sites, the Colorado River Basin snowpack is running at about 185% of median...And still getting heavy snows...

Colorado CDOT has had to blast snow to open passes this year snows have been so heavy...Wet and dry cycles for the Rockies are nothing new...

Lake Powell could be refilled this summer once runoff begins in earnest...

The lake has been at this point or lower several times in it’s history...Looks bad now, but it will be back...


21 posted on 05/25/2014 11:25:44 AM PDT by elteemike (Light travels faster than sound...That's why so many people appear bright until you hear them speak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Boots
From the BLM's description of Lake Powell water management:

The Upper Colorado River Basin regularly experiences significant year to year hydrologic variability. During the 14-year period 2000 to 2013, however, the unregulated inflow to Lake Powell, which is a good measure of hydrologic conditions in the Colorado River Basin, was above average in only 3 out of the past 14 years. The period 2000-2013 is the lowest 14-year period since the closure of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963, with an average unregulated inflow of 8.25 maf, or 76% of the 30-year average (1981-2010). (For comparison, the 1981-2010 total water year average is 10.83 maf.) The unregulated inflow during the 2000-2013 period has ranged from a low of 2.64 maf (24% of average) in water year 2002 to a high of 15.97 maf (147% of average) in water year 2011. Under the current forecast, total water year 2014 unregulated inflows to Lake Powell are expected to range between a minimum probable of 9.6 maf (88% of average) and a maximum probable of 12.7 maf (118% of average) with a most probable projection of 10.83 maf (100% of average).

They've got quite a few lean years to catch-up from; it may be decades before the lake refills completely, if ever.

22 posted on 05/25/2014 11:28:00 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: elteemike; DuncanWaring

according to DuncanWaring’s link http://lakepowell.water-data.com

Lake Powell is down from last year to nearly historic lows but its now refilling fast.

From what I’ve read, the lakes are down so low that it would take a couple years of more than 100% snowpack —as it is this year—in the rockies to refill the dams.

That said, its nice to hear there’s such a big snow pack this year.


23 posted on 05/25/2014 11:35:41 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Boots
Don’t know why they’ve let so much water out, but it’s not because of a drought.

The volume of Colorado River water that is available for irrigation in Arizona, Nevada, California and Mexico is established by the river's flow at the Utah-Arizona state line.

When the volumes were originally set, the river's flow was much greater than it is now -- it was a relatively wet period...and the evaporation and absorption attributable to Lake Powell is enormous.

Accordingly, more water has been allocated than is actually available...

24 posted on 05/25/2014 11:36:31 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

If you go to that link, and hit “Graphs” immediately below the image at the top of the page, then select “Lake Powell” from the pull-down menu, you can see a graph of the lake level for the last five years.

2011 was very good, the other three of the four previous years were bad.

Lake Mead’s also available there; it’s not doing any better.


25 posted on 05/25/2014 11:45:51 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Boots

Create a chrisis.


26 posted on 05/25/2014 2:35:35 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: elteemike; ckilmer
>

with Heavy snow pack .


27 posted on 05/25/2014 3:45:55 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: george76

Looks like the take away of the graph is that most of colorado’s snow pack goes to the colorado river.


28 posted on 05/25/2014 5:09:04 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: elteemike; george76; DuncanWaring; okie01
thanks DuncanWaring. This gives a clearer picture of the annual and cumulative rise and fall for the last 5 years. This years may not have as steep a rise as 2011 but it looks like it may cross 2013 levels and maybe touch 2012 if the snowpack in colorado is deep enough.


29 posted on 05/25/2014 5:18:43 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

The Colorado state wide snowpack is 153.45% of the May 25th average.

http://snowpack.water-data.com/uppercolorado/index.php

The Colorado and Yampa Rivers are at 168 to 166 percent above average.

ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/CO/Snow/snow/watershed/daily/co_update_snow.pdf


30 posted on 05/25/2014 5:27:29 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I tried posting that picture but couldn’t get it to work.

There is also a single chart that ostensibly shows a continuous graph of the water level since the dam was completed, but that one doesn’t seem to be working today (at least for me).


31 posted on 05/25/2014 5:36:00 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Which one ?


32 posted on 05/25/2014 5:38:45 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

In April 2005 it got down to 3555’ before the spring runoff started; the last time it had been that low was during the early months of the Nixon administration, when it was initially filling.


33 posted on 05/25/2014 5:41:00 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: george76

Graphs -> Lake Powell, then select “All Time Lake Levels” from the pull-down menu at the bottom of the page.

When its working, it gives a single-line trace of the lake level since 1963; right now it gives (me) the graph posted earlier.

Though, you can get a tabular approximation by clicking on one of the “dates” in the table on the main page; that will give you the level on that date for every year since 1963. From there, you can maneuver around to different days.


34 posted on 05/25/2014 5:45:13 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

The current forecast is to peak at 3616’, but that forecast was made prior to the Mother’s Day storm.


35 posted on 05/25/2014 5:49:49 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Thanks


36 posted on 05/25/2014 6:11:05 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Umm...I’m just sharing this as the numbers don’t ring true to me

http://www.oneonta.edu/faculty/baumanpr/geosat2/Lake_Powell/Colorado_River_Basin_Lake_Powell.htm

The linked article above is from 2001 and states at that time Glenn Canyon dam might not be able to generate power due to low lake level by 2007 and that in 2001 the lake was at 54% capacity.

Something hinky...the net result here is that folks in the SW gained another decade vs. the 2007 predictions of the Oneonta paper. Oooooo...CRISIS! /s

I think it was another FReeper that commented the Bundy fight was likely about water rights; I think that might be found to be factual.


37 posted on 05/25/2014 6:14:55 PM PDT by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

With the possible exception of the Pacific Northwest, most everything that happens west of longitude W100 is about water rights one way or another.


38 posted on 05/25/2014 6:32:00 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
Recent studies indicate the lake levels might drop below the minimum of 1050ft elev to fill hydroelectric generation inlets as early as 2017, depending upon worldwide weather models.

Then there probably is a model that says something else. El Nino will fix them right up.

39 posted on 05/25/2014 6:43:42 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

I tried posting that picture but couldn’t get it to work.
.................
This tool makes it easy to copy and past pictures or whole articles with pictures nicely laid out.

http://4html.net/Online-text-to-HTML-converter-831.html


40 posted on 05/25/2014 6:48:01 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson