A dem who is 60% liberal will still get elected by liberals. That is why they are winning they don't fight amongst themselves.
You never heard me say that I thought government should police interpersonal relationships. I believe that should be up to families. So you see, you start out putting words in my mouth that aren't there. This nation did not have police for its first hundred years or more depending upon the location. So in my world, if the family found two witnesses who testified you were poking one of their sons, I'd hope they tried and hanged you.
We both want a conservative government, but we are fighting amongst ourselves.
You don't even know what a conservative government is. In the scenario I just laid out, I'll bet you would prefer such enforcement and redress by police, lawyers, bailiffs, jailors, psychologists and a horde of other bureaucrats all on public pensions, all of whom absolutely depend upon the production of social misfits to keep them employed (which is why they vote the way they do). The more depravity there is, the more demand there is for said enforcement cohort. You are a statist. You just don't know it. I knew you were defending the gay agenda, one that was funded by socialist corporate interests in the first place (hence, you start out by being historically incorrect). You didn't deny it either.
Liberals are united in destroying the USA and we need to unite.
The primary means by which the liberals are destroying the USA are social. They control the public schools. You want them "better" while I don't want any. They control public universities. Ditto. You want more police, I want the people to do the policing. You think you can isolate social issues from conservatism, that the preference merely produces more criminals and government dependents and therefore demand for more service providers from the welfare police state.