Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Liberal Cities Leave the Rest of America Behind?
The New York Times ^ | April30,2014 | Thomas B. Edsall

Posted on 04/30/2014 5:37:55 AM PDT by Hojczyk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Hojczyk

There is a growing movement in places like NY and IL to tax companies that leave. Chicago is famous for the games they play trying to punish firms who leave.

Eventually you will see the Fedgov get into it. They don’t want to bail out say, Chicago, so they have a vested interest keeping a company there that tries to leave.


41 posted on 04/30/2014 6:00:50 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
...a solid stratum of high net worth taxpayers in key cities provide fertile ground for liberal politics...

In other words, liberal politics requires a large group of "the rich" for them to vilify, demonize, and ultimately steal from (oops, I mean tax) in order to support their utopian goals.

Ha! Hey lib lurkers out there, spoiler alert! I'll jump to the end here:

It fails, miserably. Socialist/liberal policies have never worked, never succeeded in creating happy, prosperous societies.

Guess what? Socialist policies do not work now. Neither advancing technologies nor different people in charge of the same tired old ideas makes any difference. Yes that means you.

They will never work. Quite simply they fly in the face of human nature. Without an overbearing, fascist state to enforce socialist policies societies naturally evolve away from them. Only through crushing state intervention can they be enforced. But hey, it's for their own good, right? {snort}

42 posted on 04/30/2014 6:09:00 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Republicans proposed Enterprise Zones. These would be Democrat Economic Black Hole Zones.


43 posted on 04/30/2014 6:10:27 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

If their jobs all pick up and move to Texas, don’t see how.


44 posted on 04/30/2014 6:10:55 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
They're going to make rules about when corporations may and MAY NOT leave.

Directive 10-289.

45 posted on 04/30/2014 6:14:24 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Cogito, ergo armatum sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Will Liberal Cities Leave the Rest of America Behind?

The question is phrased backwards.

46 posted on 04/30/2014 6:16:02 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
... corporations, the affluent and owners of capital can pull up stakes and relocate with ease...

It's called federalism. One very recent example, Toyota's move from California to Texas.

47 posted on 04/30/2014 6:17:42 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

48 posted on 04/30/2014 6:19:22 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
These outspoken mayors have generated a growing optimism on the Democratic left that local officials can restore support for government activism. Mayors and city councils, in this view, can lead the drive to improve the prospects and living conditions of those in the bottom third of the income distribution...

Like they're doing in Detroit? In Philadelphia? In Newark? In Baltimore? I could go on and on...

49 posted on 04/30/2014 6:19:25 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Will Liberal Cities Leave the Rest of America Behind?

Let's see, Detroit, Cleveland and Chicago are "Liberal Cities", right? Well, I pray they leave the rest of America behind!

50 posted on 04/30/2014 6:24:08 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ("Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle?" - Patrick Henry, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Yawn...nothing more than doubling down on liberal policies that have failed miserably in the past 50 years. Each generation of smug, self absorbed liberals thinks they’re smarter than the last and that they’ve finally figured out the way to get it right.


51 posted on 04/30/2014 6:25:22 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“These outspoken mayors have generated a growing optimism on the Democratic left that local officials can restore support for government activism.”

The Democratic Left seems oblivious to the flight of businesses from “Democratic Left” cities such as Neu Yuck, and don’t forget the Left Coast state, California, which just lost the Toyota National Headquarters to Texas.

When those Big Sh*ty pestholes have driven out the producers, cut the welfare cash flow, let the Urban Ferals do their tribal warfare thing, and then shoot the last one standing.

Resettle the habitats after the dieoffs.


52 posted on 04/30/2014 6:39:05 AM PDT by GladesGuru (Islam Delenda Est - because of what Islam is and because of what Muslims do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Liberals caused the mess and will continue to make the mess even bigger. They are a disgrace to the human race.


53 posted on 04/30/2014 6:39:59 AM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Heard someone propose an ‘Exodus Tax’ on Corporations leaving a jurisdiction. They would pay a percentage tax on profits made during the entire length of time they were there. It would be painful.


54 posted on 04/30/2014 6:40:27 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“The problem with killing the rich and taking their stuff is that you can only do it once.”

That problem is solved by just redefining “rich”.

The guy that lives in a box under a bridge is rich compared to the guy that doesn’t have a box to live in.


55 posted on 04/30/2014 6:59:23 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Another way to look at this is that it takes money and resources to become a liberal city. “You can’t be a progressive without prosperity,” Bruce Katz, director of the Brookings Institution’s metropolitan policy program, said in a phone interview.

Progressive system base on taking.

56 posted on 04/30/2014 7:09:44 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
Heard someone propose an ‘Exodus Tax’ on Corporations leaving a jurisdiction. They would pay a percentage tax on profits made during the entire length of time they were there. It would be painful.

Wouldn't this just give corporations more incentive to leave immediately?

57 posted on 04/30/2014 7:24:25 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael
“You can’t be a progressive without prosperity,” Bruce Katz, director of the Brookings Institution’s metropolitan policy program, said in a phone interview.

In other words, you can't be a parasite without a host organism.

58 posted on 04/30/2014 7:32:04 AM PDT by Cymbaline ("Allahu Akbar": Arabic for "Nothing To See Here" - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

In the race to third world cesspool status... Yes!


59 posted on 04/30/2014 9:20:31 AM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
How can governments adopt substantial, effective policies in order to benefit the poor and the working class when corporations, the affluent and owners of capital can pull up stakes and relocate with ease?

A: Easy...seize all private property.

Mayors and city councils, in this view, can lead the drive to improve the prospects and living conditions of those in the bottom third of the income distribution.

So there is no free enterprise. Ask the folks in the upper 2/3 of the "income distribution".

They are, in short, enacting at the municipal level many of the major policy changes that progressives have found themselves unable to enact at the federal and state levels

Why not? It worked great in Detroit!

With considerable creativity and limited power, the new urban regimes are seeking to diminish the inequality so apparent in cities and so pervasive nationwide. They are mapping the future of liberalism until the day when the national government can bring it to scale Two words...Great Society!

Man this is sad!

60 posted on 04/30/2014 9:26:53 AM PDT by gr8eman (There's no "R" in Warshington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson