Two scathing reviews by scholars working with the IPCC show why the organization is hopelessly

Wattsupwiththat.com ^ | 4/26/2014 | Anthony Watts

[rktman]

Two scathing letters critical of the IPCC process were published on Friday April 25th; one from Dr. Robert Stavins, an IPCC chapter Co-Coordinating Lead Author, and a five year veteran of the process, plus another by Dr. Richard Tol, who asked his name to be removed from work he was contributing to because it was “too alarmist”. Tol said in his letter:

‘The Himalayan glacier melt (by 2035) really was the least of the errors’ , ‘The IPCC does not guard itself against selection bias and group think’ – ‘Alarmism feeds polarization. Climate zealots want to burn heretics of global warming on a stick’

[rktman]

Or, "How to get un-invited to lavish dinner parties and posh conferences in one easy step." You are now classified "deniers" and WILL be condemned in all the spheres of influence you formerly orbited in. I guess the incandescent bulbs finally came on for a couple of "researchers".