I believe this will be fighting words to a lot of Texans.
God bless Texas.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: Jim Robinson
They don’t think think they are above the law. They think they are the law.
2 posted on
04/25/2014 11:05:47 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: LUV W; nuconvert; txhurl; GeronL
4 posted on
04/25/2014 11:08:24 AM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Jim Robinson
The Bureau claims it is not they who are declaring the ownership but that settled case law long declared it to be government land. The classic liberal mantra. "It's settled. Now shut up."
5 posted on
04/25/2014 11:08:25 AM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
To: Jim Robinson
BLM Public Relations Specialist Paul McGuire agreed to a one-on-one telephone interview with Breitbart Texas after reading the original report published earlier this week. In contrast with the interview with Texas General Land Office Commissioner Jerry Patterson, McGuire expressed much more confidence about the ownership of the land and indicated little, if any, ambiguity about how or why the land should be under federal control. Its not the BLM making any such claim as to the status of the land, McGuire said. That land was a matter that the courts adjudicated decades ago, going back to the 1920s in fact. The Supreme Court settled the matter as to where the public land in the Red River was. So, BLM is really just proceeding on those earlier court decisions. "...and this time, we're bringing tanks."
7 posted on
04/25/2014 11:08:55 AM PDT by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
To: Jim Robinson
So the BLM's argument is that they can seize hundreds of thousands of acres of land based on an obscure court decision almost 100 years ago that was never enforced?
Wow.
8 posted on
04/25/2014 11:08:58 AM PDT by
wideawake
To: Jim Robinson
That land was a matter that the courts adjudicated decades ago, going back to the 1920s in fact. It was "adjudicated" in 1836, 1845 & 1849 you ill-bred puddle-lapping mongrel of a revenuer.
If they click "go" on this.. hijinks will ensue.
To: JRandomFreeper
12 posted on
04/25/2014 11:14:06 AM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Jim Robinson
"Come and take it."
15 posted on
04/25/2014 11:17:29 AM PDT by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: Jim Robinson
Looks like it’s time for Texans to just go and take claim back from the BLM.
16 posted on
04/25/2014 11:18:46 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: Jim Robinson
Amen. God bless Texas.
If BLM shows up in Texas, tens of thousands of Texas Patriots will
greet them.
18 posted on
04/25/2014 11:23:04 AM PDT by
tennmountainman
(Just Say No To Obamacare)
To: Jim Robinson
>>God bless Texas.<<
God have mercy on BLM
To: Jim Robinson
Your right Jim, The Federal Government doesn’t own the land the American People own the land and Parks and State, Federal Buildings!!!
21 posted on
04/25/2014 11:27:44 AM PDT by
tallyhoe
To: Jim Robinson
Well past time to be using GPS as part of the plot boundaries. Especially for land near and abutting moving water.
24 posted on
04/25/2014 11:29:31 AM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Jim Robinson
Oh, hell no.
25 posted on
04/25/2014 11:30:01 AM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Jim Robinson
The BLM doesn’t own any of the land. The Fed, in reality based on original intent, manages the land until it is disposed of, and it is intended to be disposed of.
28 posted on
04/25/2014 11:34:26 AM PDT by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: Jim Robinson
This Obama government needs a good dressing down. They “own” nothing, the people do.
Only hope for this country is their removal. What an arrogant bunch of bastards.
29 posted on
04/25/2014 11:37:27 AM PDT by
dforest
To: Jim Robinson
The BLM is a raving band of morons if they think they can push Texas around like this.
As an odd coincidence, I watched the John Wayne movie “Red River” last night on TCM.
To: Jim Robinson
My only question is, what's
BLM's Harry Reid's angle on this?
Harry Reid is the BLM with his hand picked sock puppet running it.
Start something up in Texas to take the pressure and closer looking off of what he and his family have been up to in Nevada?
Just doesn't make sense to start up in Texas, right now especially, except to use it as a distraction.
Ain't no way the BLM is going to win this and they know it.
35 posted on
04/25/2014 11:42:49 AM PDT by
The Cajun
(tea party!!!, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert......Nuff said.)
To: Jim Robinson
“Ours” they say, as if BLM is some autonomous being exclusive of the American people. This is how absurd things have become. They really need to be put out of their miserable existence.
To: Jim Robinson
This should be interesting. I truly want to see the girly-man Obama try to square up with Rick Perry.
38 posted on
04/25/2014 11:44:59 AM PDT by
Dr. Thorne
("How long, O Lord, holy and true?" - Rev. 6:10)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson