Posted on 04/21/2014 8:29:23 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
Abortion is not with the job description of the federal government, AKA the Constitution. It is within the jurisdiction of the state governments.
Each of your paragraphs includes some kind of error. This conservative Christian libertarian Republican thinks you’re full of $#!@.
LOL, “”This conservative Christian libertarian Republican thinks you’re full of $#!@.””
Sodom and Gomorrah had plenty of libertarians, but was very short on conservatives.
What about on military base hospitals for federal military and in federal hospitals?
Murdering a baby is a personal decision
There’s a difference between libertarians and Libertarians. More deception.
No there isn’t, the deception is to try that fake out while pushing the cult to different audiences, the Ted Kennedy argument, “I’m personally opposed, but.......
There is no argument between the libertarians and the party platform they created, to put their fantasies into political language.
What do you think you guys are always arguing against with the conservatives here, it sure isn’t about economics.
There is no libertarian party platform. There is a Libertarian Party platform.
Claiming all libertarians subscribe to the Libertarian Party platform is like claiming all conservatives adhere to the Republican Party platform; it's simply a lie.
Conservatives and libertarians don't argue about economics because they don't disagree about economics.
Duh.
Of course not all libertarians agree perfectly with their philosophy, but they do agree enough to be libertarians instead of conservatives.
"Conservatives and libertarians don't argue about economics because they don't disagree about economics.
Duh."
NO KIDDING, SO WHY ARE LIBERTARIANS ALWAYS ARGUING AGAINST CONSERVATISM AND THE CONSERVATIVES OF FREEREPUBLIC? BECAUSE OF THE LEFT WING PORTIONS OF THEIR LIBERTARIAN AGENDA.
>> Portland pediatric neurosurgeon Monica Wehby
A pediatric neurosurgeon ambivalent about the killing of nascent human life?
A woman’s sense of liberty must not be defined by having the right to kill.
>> There is no libertarian party platform. There is a Libertarian Party platform.
Correct.
>> There is no disagreement between libertarianism and it’s party.
Basic libertarianism is about enforcement. LP is really a classic Liberal platform more than it is a libertarian platform.
And there is no disagreement between libertarians and their libertarian party, that is why the libertarian war is against conservatism, and not libertarianism.
There are indeed libertarians that support the LP platform — effectively supporting sodomy by law and killing nascent life by law. But there are also libertarians that support neither. Of course you’re free to apply a uniform characterization, but the generalization doesn’t help the valid part of your arguments concerning the flawed LP platform and those whom subscribe to it.
The uniform characterization is that libertarians are self proclaimed and self identify as libertarians and support libertarianism over conservatism and to overcome conservatism and to defeat conservatism politically.
Do some of them stray from various points on purity, of course, a sane person can’t understand why a person claiming to be pro-life would support the pro-abortion libertarian movement, but some claim to, just as some democrats claim to be pro-life.
You're the victim of a selection bias: when a libertarian argues with you, you think only libertarians argue with conservatives. When a conservative argues with you, you believe it's because of a single point of disagreement between you and one other person. You're over-generalizing.
You've been called out on this many times before. You simply don't know what you're talking about.
Is that dishonest, or just silly? Libertarians argue with conservatives because they oppose them, since FR is a conservative site, that means we and libertarians argue about the libertarian's left wing views and politics.
For instance abortion, and gay marriage, the border, the gay agenda, drugs, national defense, etc., the usual issues that divide left and right.
Another example: the idea of keeping the federal government out of drugs is a conservative position. Channel William F. Buckley Jr., or James Madison and see what they have to say.
Talk about silly; in your blind hatred of Libertarians (whom you misidentify as libertarians) you actually think that all conservatives are social conservatives. Wrong. Only about half of those identifying as conservative say that their religion is a significant component of their political ideology.
Libertarians do support the homosexual agenda and gay marriage, it is probably our biggest argument with libertarians here at FR, in fact we have to deal with everyday, as you said, libertarians/Libertarians and conservatives agree on economic issues, the disagreement is that libertarians are left on social issues.
Libertarianism:
“”Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.””
Rand Paul: (selling that agenda to GOP voters)
“I think that the Republican Party, in order to get bigger, will have to agree to disagree on social issues,” Paul advised. “The Republican Party is not going to give up on having quite a few people who do believe in traditional marriage. But the Republican Party also has to find a place for young people and others who don’t want to be festooned by those issues.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.